Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Source documents Order — No. 3:25-cr-00106 (Dkt. 59, W.D.N.C.)

Order — No. 3:25-cr-00106 (Dkt. 59, W.D.N.C.)

Summary

An order in United States v. Tijema Brown and Antionette Rouse, Criminal Action No. 3:25-CR-00106-KDB-SCR, in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, Charlotte Division, filed January 30, 2026 as Document 59 (1 page) and signed January 30, 2026. On its own motion and the motion of Defendant Tijema Brown (Doc. No. 56), the Court continues the case from March 2, 2026 under 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A), finding that the ends of justice served by a continuance outweigh the public's and defendants' interest in a speedy trial. Trial is scheduled for the next term of court.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Cite this document

“Order — No. 3:25-cr-00106 (Dkt. 59, W.D.N.C.).” Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/order-no-3-25-cr-00106-dkt-59-w-d-n-c-4884e9cd12/, SHA-256 a2bccd802d9117778234b8ed3f8fe4fbd38fda63020c722386623bbb4d7ae4c4.

Full text

                          IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                     FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
                                  CHARLOTTE DIVISION
                       CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 3:25-CR-00106-KDB-SCR

 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                Plaintiff,

                v.                                                  ORDER

 TIJEMA BROWN AND
 ANTIONETTE ROUSE,

                Defendants.



       THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT on its own motion and the motion of

Defendant Tijema Brown (Doc. No. 56) to continue this matter from March 2, 2026. Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A), and for the reasons stated in the Motion, the Court finds the ends of

justice served by continuance outweigh the interest of the public and Defendant to a speedy trial.

       The Court further finds that the other Defendant’s case is “joined for trial with a co-

defendant as to whom the time for trial has not run and no motion for severance has been granted,”

18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(6), and that failure to continue this matter would result in a miscarriage of

justice. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(i). The Court further finds that the ends of justice served by

taking such action outweigh the best interest of the public and Defendants to a speedy trial.

       IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that trial of this matter be scheduled for the next term

of court. The Clerk is directed to certify copies of this Order to Defendants, Counsel for

Defendants, the United States Attorney, the United States Marshals Service, and the United States
                                         Signed: January 30, 2026
Probation Office.

       SO ORDERED.




    Case 3:25-cr-00106-KDB-SCR             Document 59         Filed 01/30/26    Page 1 of 1

File and source

File
59.pdf
Size
190,106 bytes
SHA-256
a2bccd802d9117778234b8ed3f8fe4fbd38fda63020c722386623bbb4d7ae4c4
Our copy
59.pdf
Original
No public link identified.
Back to top