Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home United States v. Michael Wayne Hanzuk, II — Order re Motion for Default Judgment, District of AlaskaSearch ⌕

United States v. Michael Wayne Hanzuk, II — Order re Motion for Default Judgment, District of Alaska

Summary

A one-page order by United States District Judge Sharon L. Gleason of the United States District Court for the District of Alaska in United States v. Michael Wayne Hanzuk, II, Case No. 3:23-cv-00240-SLG, dated December 22, 2023 and filed as Document 12. It addresses the government's motion for default judgment at Docket 10. The court finds the motion lacks sufficient evidentiary support, under oath or affirmation, that the $2,000 payment dated April 20, 2020 was in addition to, and not part of, the $106,000 payment attested to in Exhibit 1 at Docket 11-1. The order allows the plaintiff to file a supplement addressing the issue within 14 days.

Summary drafted by a model from the text of the original file linked on this page and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Cite this document

“United States v. Michael Wayne Hanzuk, II — Order re Motion for Default Judgment, District of Alaska.” Original at archive.org. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/order-no-3-23-cv-00240-dkt-12-76922af7eb/, SHA-256 08dc6df51495c04b9005ac458aa07bcebc32d7151272b6d100e8816010199bcb.

Full text

                  IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                        FOR THE DISTRICT OF ALASKA



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                   Plaintiff,
            v.

MICHAEL WAYNE HANZUK, II,
                                                Case No. 3:23-cv-00240-SLG
                   Defendant.



  ORDER RE MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT AGAINST DEFENDANT
                  MICHAEL WAYNE HANZUK, II

      Before the Court at Docket 10 is the Government’s Motion for Default

Judgment Against Defendant Michael Wayne Hanzuk, II. Upon review, the Court

finds that the motion contains insufficient evidentiary support for the $2,000

payment dated April 20, 2020, that makes clear under oath or affirmation that this

payment was in addition to, and not part of the $106,000 payment attested to in

Exhibit 1 to the Affidavit of Counsel at Docket 11-1.

      Plaintiff may file a supplement to the motion that addresses this issue within

14 days of the date of this order.

      DATED this 22nd day of December, 2023, at Anchorage, Alaska.


                                             /s/ Sharon L. Gleason
                                             UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE




        Case 3:23-cv-00240-SLG Document 12 Filed 12/22/23 Page 1 of 1

File and source

File
12-order.pdf
Size
107,373 bytes
SHA-256
08dc6df51495c04b9005ac458aa07bcebc32d7151272b6d100e8816010199bcb
Our copy
12-order.pdf
Original
archive.org
Back to top