Order — No. 3:21-cr-00114 (Dkt. 36, W.D.N.C.)
Summary
An order in United States v. Maurice Kamgaing, 3:21-CR-00114-KDB-DSC-1, in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, Charlotte Division, signed January 12, 2023. The Court denies the defendant's pro se motion (Doc. No. 35) for a recommendation to the Bureau of Prisons for placement in a Residential Re-Entry Center under the Second Chance Act of 2007, as reauthorized by Section 603 of the First Step Act of 2018. It states that the Attorney General, through the Bureau of Prisons, designates the place of incarceration, and that the custodial authorities are better informed and qualified to make such decisions at this stage of the sentence.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Cite this document
“Order — No. 3:21-cr-00114 (Dkt. 36, W.D.N.C.).”
Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/order-no-3-21-cr-00114-dkt-36-w-d-n-c-c1b8eef1ed/
, SHA-256 091334e5b921edee82054d6a6df8b0c75775b1bc0f6203dd2f4a2502e6402b54.Full text
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
CHARLOTTE DIVISION
3:21-CR-00114-KDB-DSC-1
USA )
)
v. ) ORDER
)
MAURICE KAMGAING )
)
THIS MATTER is before the Court upon a motion of the defendant pro se for
a recommendation to the Bureau of Prisons for placement in a Residential Re-Entry
Center under the Second Chance Act of 2007 which was reauthorized by Section 603
of the First Step Act of 2018. (Doc. No. 35). According to the Bureau of Prison
website, the defendant is scheduled to be released from prison on August 10, 2024.
It is the responsibility of the Attorney General, through the Bureau of
Prisons, to designate the place of incarceration, United States v. Evans, 159 F.3d
908, 912 (4th Cir. 1998) (authority to designate place of confinement vested in
BOP), which is reflected in the language of the statute that “[t]he Attorney General,
in coordination with the Director of the Bureau of Prisons, shall,…, conduct the
following activities to establish a Federal prisoner reentry initiative.” 34 U.S.C. §
60541(a).
The Court hereby declines to make such a recommendation because
defendant’s current sentence and conditions of custody are sufficient but not greater
than necessary to accomplish the goals of sentencing. Furthermore, at this stage in
Defendant’s sentence, the custodial authorities are more informed and qualified to
make such decisions regarding conditions of custody.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED, that the defendant’s pro se motion for
recommendation for placement in a Residential Re-Entry Center (Doc. No. 35), is
DENIED.
SO ORDERED.
Signed: January 12, 2023
File and source
- File
- 36.pdf
- Size
- 115,632 bytes
- SHA-256
- 091334e5b921edee82054d6a6df8b0c75775b1bc0f6203dd2f4a2502e6402b54
- Our copy
- 36.pdf
- Original
- No public link identified.