Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Source documents Order — No. 3:20-cr-00435 (Dkt. 194, W.D.N.C.)

Order — No. 3:20-cr-00435 (Dkt. 194, W.D.N.C.)

Summary

The court denied Izzat Freitekh's motion for bond pending appeal (Doc. No. 184) in Docket No. 3:20-cr-00435-FDW-DCK in the Western District of North Carolina, finding he had not met the requirements for release pending appeal in 18 U.S.C. § 3143(b). The order, signed March 21, 2023, relies on the government's opposition brief (Doc. No. 186) and the court's prior rulings.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Cite this document

“Order — No. 3:20-cr-00435 (Dkt. 194, W.D.N.C.).” Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/order-no-3-20-cr-00435-dkt-194-w-d-n-c-2595d60c9f/, SHA-256 0d7cb48494773f80e97628f9b7ecac9ef9921d9121c0ed0ddac52e039abbcd5f.

Full text

                          UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                       WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
                               CHARLOTTE DIVISION
                         DOCKET NO. 3:20-cr-00435-FDW-DCK
 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                          )
                                                    )
 vs.                                                )
                                                    )
 IZZAT FREITEKH,                                    )                 ORDER
                                                    )
         Defendant.                                 )
                                                    )
                                                    )

        THIS MATTER is before the Court on Defendant’s Motion for Bond Pending Appeal,

(Doc. No. 184). For the reasons stated in the Government’s brief in opposition, (Doc. No. 186),

and the reasons already provided by this Court in its prior rulings on the issues raised in

Defendant’s instant motion, Defendant has failed to carry his burden to satisfy the requirements

for release pending appeal in 18 U.S.C. § 3143(b). Accordingly, the motion is DENIED.

        IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion for Bond Pending Appeal, (Doc.

No. 184), is DENIED.

        IT IS SO ORDERED.

                                    Signed: March 21, 2023




                                                1



       Case 3:20-cr-00435-FDW-DCK Document 194 Filed 03/21/23 Page 1 of 1


File and source

File
194.pdf
Size
156,053 bytes
SHA-256
0d7cb48494773f80e97628f9b7ecac9ef9921d9121c0ed0ddac52e039abbcd5f
Our copy
194.pdf
Original
No public link identified.
Back to top