Order — No. 2:24-cr-00305 (Dkt. 102, M.D. Ala.)

Summary

An order in United States v. Tametria Conner Dantzler, Criminal Action No. 2:24cr305-MHT, in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Alabama, Northern Division, filed September 29, 2025 as Document 102 (4 pages) and signed by Judge Myron H. Thompson. It grants in part the defendant's motion (Doc. 88) to modify a condition of supervised release that requires her to serve weekends in jail for one year (Doc. 66). She may serve her jail time on the days each week that her ex-husband has two consecutive days off, rather than Fridays at 5:00 p.m. to Sundays at 5:00 p.m. The condition is rewritten as 52 weekends in jail, or an equivalent period each week, for one year, and the motion is otherwise denied.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Full text

  Case 2:24-cr-00305-MHT-SMD   Document 102   Filed 09/29/25   Page 1 of 4



  IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE

      MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA           )
                                   )      CRIMINAL ACTION NO.
      v.                           )         2:24cr305-MHT
                                   )              (WO)
TAMETRIA CONNER DANTZLER           )

                                ORDER

    This case is before the court on defendant Tametria

Conner     Dantzler’s    motion     to   modify      a   condition           of

supervised release (Doc. 88).            The condition she seeks

to modify states: “The defendant shall serve weekends in

jail for one year.         The defendant will report at 5:00

p.m. on Fridays and will be released at 5:00 p.m. on

Sundays.” Judgment (Doc. 66) at 5, para. 4.                Although she

initially indicated that she is not asking the court to

eliminate the required jail time, Dantzler later asked

the court to replace jail time with home confinement.

The basis for her motion was the difficulty and expense

of finding childcare for her children while she was

serving weekends in jail, given her ex-husband’s work

schedule.
  Case 2:24-cr-00305-MHT-SMD    Document 102   Filed 09/29/25   Page 2 of 4




       Having considered the representations and arguments

made in the motion, briefs, and reports of the parties;

the representations and arguments made at the hearing on

September 25, 2025; and the factors set forth in 18 U.S.C.

§ 3553(a)(1), (a)(2)(B), (a)(2)(C), (a)(2)(D), (a)(4),

(a)(5), (a)(6), and (a)(7), the court finds that the

motion should be granted only to the following extent.

Dantzler will be allowed to serve her jail time on the

days    each   week     that     her     ex-husband      has     his     two

consecutive days off of work, rather than requiring her

to serve each Friday at 5 p.m. to Sunday at 5 p.m.                       This

modification       should    afford     sufficient     flexibility            to

address     Dantzler’s       concerns.      The    probation       officer

indicated that he can arrange for her to serve in this

way    so   long   as   he    receives    advanced      notice      of    her

ex-husband’s work schedule.              It will be incumbent upon

Dantzler to ensure that her probation officer receives

her ex-husband’s work schedule every three weeks.



                                    2
  Case 2:24-cr-00305-MHT-SMD   Document 102       Filed 09/29/25    Page 3 of 4




      As for the concern raised about her children’s future

medical appointments, Dantzler should reach out to the

doctors now and inform them that Fridays will not work

for the remainder of her first year of supervision and

have any appointments rescheduled.                   Alternatively, she

may   wish    to   prepare     her       ex-husband       to       attend    the

appointments.

      In general, the court cannot eliminate or redress

all    hardships,      conflicts,           and      even          substantial

inconveniences faced by Dantzler and her family during

the period at issue.

      Accordingly, it is ORDERED that:

      (1) The motion to modify a condition of supervised

release (Doc. 88) is granted to the extent explained

above, and is otherwise denied.

      (2) Special condition of supervised release number

4, see Judgment (Doc. 66) at 5, para. 4, is modified as

follows:     “The defendant shall serve 52 weekends in jail,

or an equivalent period of time each week, for one year.

                                     3
  Case 2:24-cr-00305-MHT-SMD   Document 102   Filed 09/29/25   Page 4 of 4




The defendant shall work with her ex-husband to ensure

that    her   probation    officer     receives       notice      of    her

ex-husband’s work schedule and days off in a prompt

manner upon issuance of the work schedule every three

weeks.    The defendant will report at 5:00 p.m. on the day

designated by her probation officer for her to begin

serving time each week and will be released after serving

48 hours.”

       DONE, this the 29th day of September, 2025.

                                    /s/ Myron H. Thompson
                                 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE




                                   4


File and source

File

102.pdf

Size

61,829 bytes

SHA-256

30033c03ab11b031e094af24e346107f76a34d5d0d4357f83d619aedda4f66cc

Our copy

102.pdf

Original

No public link identified.