Order — No. 2:22-cr-00993 (Dkt. 105, D.S.C.)
Summary
An order in United States v. Jonathan Ramaci, Criminal No. 2:22-993-RMG, in the U.S. District Court for the District of South Carolina, Charleston Division, filed March 27, 2024 as Entry Number 105 (3 pages) and signed by Richard M. Gergel. It denies the defendant's motion (Dkt. No. 103) to continue his trial, scheduled for June 10, 2024, after a hearing on March 27, 2024 on recently produced discovery. The order recounts that he was indicted on December 7, 2022 on three counts of wire fraud, including a scheme to defraud the Small Business Administration in Paycheck Protection Program and EIDL applications, and that a superseding indictment of January 10, 2024 added tax and money laundering counts. The Court finds defense counsel will have adequate time to prepare.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Cite this document
“Order — No. 2:22-cr-00993 (Dkt. 105, D.S.C.).”
Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/order-no-2-22-cr-00993-dkt-105-d-s-c-48518913f6/
, SHA-256 05e1443533780bcb73c9c75531dbd6d03a263c15cdf4fa515b5a56f9588cb878.Full text
2:22-cr-00993-RMG Date Filed 03/27/24 Entry Number 105 Page 1 of 3
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA
CHARLESTON DIVISION
United States of America, )
)
vs. ) Criminal No. 2:22-993-RMG
)
Jonathan Ramaci, )
)
Defendant. ) ORDER
)
____________________________________)
This matter comes before the Court on Defendant’s motion of March 26, 2027 to
continue his trial presently scheduled to begin on June 10, 2024. (Dkt. No. 103). Defendant
asserted in his motion that he had received 12,500 pages of discovery on February 9, 2024 and
March 18, 2024, and additional time was necessary to allow the Defendant, counsel and defense
experts to prepare for trial. (Id. at 2). The Court conducted a hearing on the motion on March 27,
2024 and fully reviewed with counsel the substance of the recently produced and previously
produced discovery.
By way of background, Defendant was indicted on December 7, 2022, with three counts
of wire fraud. Count One alleged a scheme to defraud investors in Defendant’s company
Elements of Genuis and his alleged diversion of company funds for his personal use. Counts
Two and Three alleged a scheme to defraud the Small Business Administration in applications to
obtain forgivable loans under the Paycheck Protection Program (“PPP”) and loans under the
Economic Injury Disaster Loan (“EIDL”) program, both COVID-19 related relief programs.
(Dkt. No. 1). The present legal defense team were substituted as counsel on June 26, 2023, and
1
2:22-cr-00993-RMG Date Filed 03/27/24 Entry Number 105 Page 2 of 3
the Defendant was granted continuances on August 22, 2023 and December 18, 2023 to allow
newly appointed counsel an adequate time to prepare.
The Court conducted a status conference with counsel on January 5, 2024. The
Government informed the Court that it intended to present a superseding indictment to the
Federal Grand Jury and to add counts related to alleged tax law and money laundering violations
arising out of the previously indicted conduct. Defendant again asked for a continuance to allow
adequate time for trial preparation. The federal grand jury issued a superseding indictment on
January 10, 2024. The Court continued the case until May 28, 2024 and set a day certain trial
date for that day. On January 19, 2024, the Court moved the trial to June 10, 2024, to resolve a
conflict on the Court’s docket. Prior to the movement of the trial date from May 28, 2024 to
June 10, 2024, all counsel confirmed to the Court that a June 10, 2024 trial date worked with
their calendars.
The Court was advised by the Government at the March 27, 2024 hearing that it produced
to Defendant three volumes of discovery on January 11, 2024. Volumes I and II were duplicates
of the discovery previously produced by the Government. Volume III contained 3,358 pages of
new discovery, consisting of Defendant’s prior tax filings and summaries of interviews
conducted by IRS agents. On February 9, 2024, the Government produced Volume IV of
discovery consisting of approximately 9,500 documents. This discovery included 4,000 pages
related to a forensic analysis by the FBI with attachments from Defendant’s financial records,
which had already been produced to Defendant. This batch of discovery also included filings by
Defendant in a Massachusetts family court proceeding and a 2017 loan application. On March
18, 2024, the Government produced, at defense counsel’s request, IRS interview documents that
were previously incorporated into FBI reports that had earlier been produced to Defendant.
2
2:22-cr-00993-RMG Date Filed 03/27/24 Entry Number 105 Page 3 of 3
More recently, the Government learned that one of its witnesses had discovered additional 50
emails with attachments and produced these documents to Defendant. The Government
indicated that the witness was searching to confirm all emails had been produced and anticipated
any final emails that might be discovered would be produced within the week.
After carefully reviewing the discovery issues with counsel at the hearing on March 27,
2024, the Court has determined that the great majority of documents produced on January 11,
2024 and February 9, 2024 were either duplicates of previously produced discovery and/or
Defendant’s personal and business records. The bulk of these documents have been in defense
counsel’s possession since no later than February 9, 2024, four months before trial. Further, the
basic factual background which constitutes the charges against Defendant was set forth in the
December 7, 2022 indictment, with the January 10, 2024 superseding indictment setting forth
these allegations more specifically while adding related tax and money laundering counts.
The Court has granted the present defense team three continuances since they came on
board on June 26, 2023, the last on January 5, 2024 which resulted in a continuance of the trial
until June 10, 2024. After a full review of this matter, the Court is fully satisfied that
Defendant’s defense team, who are experienced criminal defense attorneys, will have adequate
time to prepare for trial. Consequently, Defendant’s motion for a continuance (Dkt. No. 103) is
DENIED.
AND IT IS SO ORDERED.
__________________________
s/Richard M. Gergel
Richard Mark Gergel
United States District Court
Charleston, South Carolina
March 27, 2024
3
File and source
- File
- 105.pdf
- Size
- 150,925 bytes
- SHA-256
- 05e1443533780bcb73c9c75531dbd6d03a263c15cdf4fa515b5a56f9588cb878
- Our copy
- 105.pdf
- Original
- No public link identified.