Order — No. 2:22-cr-00192 (Dkt. 333, E.D. Pa.)

Summary

An order in United States v. Francis J. Battista, Crim. No. 22-192, in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, filed June 9, 2026 as Document 333 (1 page) and signed by Paul S. Diamond. Referring to an accompanying Memorandum (Doc. No. 332), the order denies without prejudice the defendant's First and Amended Motions for Reconsideration (Doc. Nos. 286, 287). It provides that if, by June 23, 2026, he has not agreed to the adversarial proceeding discussed in the Memorandum, the motion will be denied with prejudice, and it denies his Motions to Continue Sentencing (Doc. Nos. 291, 292, 293) as moot.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Full text

       Case 2:22-cr-00192-PD           Document 333       Filed 06/09/26    Page 1 of 1




                       IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                    FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA                         :
                                                 :
            v.                                   :          Crim. No. 22-192
                                                 :
FRANCIS J. BATTISTA                              :

                                             ORDER
       AND NOW, this 9th day of June, 2026, upon consideration of the Defendant’s First and

Amended Motions for Reconsideration (Doc. Nos. 286, 287), Motions to Continue Sentencing

(Doc. Nos. 291, 292, 293), and the Government’s Response in Opposition (Doc. No. 294); and as

discussed in the accompanying Memorandum (Doc. No. 332), it is hereby ORDERED that:

       1.        The Motions for Reconsideration (Doc. Nos. 286, 287) are DENIED without

                 prejudice;

       2.        If, by June 23, 2026, the Defendant has not agreed to the adversarial proceeding

                 discussed in the Memorandum, the Motion will be denied with prejudice; and

       3.        The Defendant’s Motions to Continue Sentencing (Doc. Nos. 291, 292, 293) are

                 DENIED as moot.

                                                            AND IT IS SO ORDERED.



                                                            /s/ Paul S. Diamond
                                                            _________________________
                                                            Paul S. Diamond, J.


File and source

File

333.pdf

Size

123,202 bytes

SHA-256

bc1f2056557eef3c6c7367f768f5d4abd4fa77821e7ffdbb0528de7c010d969a

Our copy

333.pdf

Original

archive.org