Order — No. 1:21-cv-00748 (Dkt. 60)

Summary

An order in Natasha Athens, d/b/a Favorite Things v. Bank of America, Case No. 21-cv-748-SM, in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Hampshire, dated December 6, 2021 and filed as Document 60. The court finds that the pro se plaintiff's responses do not address the pending motion to dismiss, and that the bank also does not make clear why the determination that the PPP loan does not qualify for forgiveness is plainly correct. It gives the plaintiff a further opportunity to show why the PPP loan is entitled to forgiveness, allowing both sides to file a short supplemental brief on or before December 24, 2021. The order also holds that the plaintiff's interlocutory appeal of the denial of recusal motions does not divest the court of jurisdiction. The signature block names United States District Judge Steven J. McAuliffe.

Summary drafted by a model from the text of the original file linked on this page and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used