Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Source documents Order — No. 1:21-cr-20242 (Dkt. 117, S.D. Fla.)

Order — No. 1:21-cr-20242 (Dkt. 117, S.D. Fla.)

Summary

An order in United States v. Joseph Timothy Grenon, et al., Case No. 21-20242-CR-ALTONAGA, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida, entered September 19, 2022 as Document 117 (2 pages), with the signature block of Chief Judge Cecilia M. Altonaga. It denies the defendants' Motions to Dismiss for Failure to Provide a Speedy Trial and Prosecutorial Misconduct [ECF Nos. 104, 105 & 106], which seek dismissal of the Indictment [ECF No. 16]. The Court states that the accusations of prosecutorial misconduct are ill-advised and that the administrative orders and orders continuing the trial result in zero non-excludable Speedy Trial days elapsing.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Cite this document

“Order — No. 1:21-cr-20242 (Dkt. 117, S.D. Fla.).” Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/order-no-1-21-cr-20242-dkt-117-s-d-fla-4af37f974a/, SHA-256 619f6d511a293da5859ac763959a01492228402d1b2ffd7f91e9f5855c2f4bb7.

Full text

Case 1:21-cr-20242-CMA Document 117 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/19/2022 Page 1 of 2




                              UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                              SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

                              CASE NO. 21-20242-CR-ALTONAGA

  UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

         Plaintiff,
  v.

  JOSEPH TIMOTHY GRENON, et al.,

        Defendants.
  _______________________________/

                                                ORDER

         THIS CAUSE came before the Court on Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss for Failure to

  Provide a Speedy Trial and Prosecutorial Misconduct [ECF Nos. 104, 105, 106]. The nearly

  identical Motions seek dismissal of the Indictment [ECF No. 16] due to the Court’s failure to

  provide Defendants a speedy trial and on the mistaken assumption the Government has engaged

  in prosecutorial misconduct by asking that competency evaluations of the Defendants be

  conducted. (See generally id.; Order [ECF No. 85]). As the Government correctly notes in its

  Response . . . [ECF No. 110], the accusations of prosecutorial misconduct are ill-advised, as the

  Court ordered that Defendants be evaluated for competency; the Government neither moved for

  the evaluations nor suggested them. (See id. 2). As to the claimed violations of Defendants’

  speedy trial rights, the several Administrative Orders entered (see id. (citations omitted)) and the

  several Orders continuing the trial in this case (see id. 3–4 (citations omitted)) result in zero non-

  excludable Speedy Trial days elapsing. Defendants’ speedy trial rights have not been violated.

         Being fully advised, it is

         ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Motions to Dismiss for Failure to Provide a

  Speedy Trial and Prosecutorial Misconduct [ECF Nos. 104, 105 & 106] are DENIED.
Case 1:21-cr-20242-CMA Document 117 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/19/2022 Page 2 of 2

                                                  CASE NO. 21-20242-CR-ALTONAGA


        DONE AND ORDERED in Miami, Florida, this 19th day of September, 2022.



                                          _______________________________________
                                          CECILIA M. ALTONAGA
                                          CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

  cc:   counsel of record
        Defendants, pro se




                                           2

File and source

File
117.pdf
Size
143,301 bytes
SHA-256
619f6d511a293da5859ac763959a01492228402d1b2ffd7f91e9f5855c2f4bb7
Our copy
117.pdf
Original
No public link identified.
Back to top