Order — No. 1:21-cr-00216 (Dkt. 88, W.D. Tex.)
Summary
An order in United States v. Michael Fullerton, No. 1:21-CR-00216-RP, in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas, Austin Division, filed September 23, 2022 as Document 88 (2 pages) and signed by Dustin M. Howell. It grants the appointed attorney's Motion to Withdraw as Counsel and for Appointment of New Counsel (Dkt. 79), after a hearing held September 23, 2022 (Dkt. 82). Assistant Federal Public Defender Jesus Salinas is permitted to withdraw and James R. Young is appointed to represent the defendant. The order advises that future requests for new appointed counsel will not be well taken, citing United States v. Moore, 706 F.2d 538.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Cite this document
“Order — No. 1:21-cr-00216 (Dkt. 88, W.D. Tex.).”
Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/order-no-1-21-cr-00216-dkt-88-w-d-tex-85d70b297e/
, SHA-256 6679ba747306e21d4d6dbae8d058bd0f93c3d797cf13f7f98e8215bb11520f4e.Full text
Case 1:21-cr-00216-RP Document 88 Filed 09/23/22 Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
AUSTIN DIVISION
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, §
§
§
v. § No. 1:21-CR-00216-RP
§
(1) MICHAEL FULLERTON, §
Defendant §
ORDER
Before the Court is Defendant’s appointed attorney’s Motion to Withdraw as
Counsel and for Appointment of New Counsel, Dkt. 79. The District Court referred
the motion to the undersigned for disposition. Dkt. 80. The Motion states that
Defendant “has lost faith and all confidence in defense counsel. Accordingly, defense
counsel and [Defendant] are no longer able to communicate effectively.” Dkt. 79, at 1.
Defendant’s responses to the motion, which he filed pro se, confirm counsel’s
representations regarding the state of their working relationship. Dkts, 84, 85. The
undersigned set the motion for a hearing, which was held on September 23, 2022.
Dkt. 82. Defendant and his appointed counsel, Assistant Federal Public Defender
Jesus Salinas, were present.
Based on the representations in the filings and confirmed on the record during
the Court’s hearing on the motion, the Court will permit the withdrawal of Mr.
Salinas and appoint new counsel. However, as the Court advised Defendant during
the hearing on the motion, future requests for new appointed counsel will not be well-
taken. Moreover, the Court reminds Defendant (again reiterating what he was told
1
Case 1:21-cr-00216-RP Document 88 Filed 09/23/22 Page 2 of 2
on the record during the hearing), the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit has
observed that “a persistent, unreasonable demand for dismissal of counsel and
appointment of new counsel … is the functional equivalent of a knowing and
voluntary waiver of counsel.” United States v. Moore, 706 F.2d 538, 540 (5th Cir.
1983); see also United States v. Mesquiti, 854 F.3d 267, 272 (5th Cir. 2017) (same);
United States v. Fields, 483 F.3d 313, 350 (5th Cir. 2007) (“[I]ndigent defendants have
no right to appointed counsel of their choice.”).
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Motion, Dkt. 79, is GRANTED. Mr.
Salinas is permitted to WITHDRAW as counsel for Defendant, and Mr. James R.
Young, 1411 West Ave., Suite 200, Austin, TX 78701, (512) 472-1961, is appointed to
represent Defendant in the above-captioned case. The Court FURTHER ORDERS
that Mr. Salinas meet with Mr. Young at the earliest opportunity to give Mr. Young
a copy of the file and bring him up to date with regard to the representation of
Defendant. Thereafter, Mr. Salinas has no further responsibilities in this case.
SIGNED September 23, 2022.
DUSTIN M. HOWELL
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATGE JUDGE
2
File and source
- File
- 88.pdf
- Size
- 87,507 bytes
- SHA-256
- 6679ba747306e21d4d6dbae8d058bd0f93c3d797cf13f7f98e8215bb11520f4e
- Our copy
- 88.pdf
- Original
- No public link identified.