Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Source documents Order — No. 1:20-cr-00228 (Dkt. 339, N.D. Ga.)

Order — No. 1:20-cr-00228 (Dkt. 339, N.D. Ga.)

Summary

An order in Maurice Fayne v. United States of America, Criminal Action No. 1:20-CR-228-MHC-JKL and Civil Action No. 1:23-CV-4917-MHC-JKL, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, Atlanta Division, filed May 30, 2024 as Document 339 (2 pages), with the signature block of District Judge Mark H. Cohen. The Court approves and adopts the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 337), to which no objections were filed. It denies without prejudice the movant's motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence (Doc. 326) for failure to comply with the Magistrate Judge's Order of March 12, 2024, and directs the Clerk to close the civil case file.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Cite this document

“Order — No. 1:20-cr-00228 (Dkt. 339, N.D. Ga.).” Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/order-no-1-20-cr-00228-dkt-339-n-d-ga-a159b16998/, SHA-256 19393d03f7bfb7dee50bdffd51c2bb3f74e285c91cc685d2d56f06a7ed85fc8a.

Full text

Text recognized from a scanned document; may contain errors.

Case 1:20-cr-00228-MHC-JKL Document 339 Filed 05/30/24 Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA

ATLANTA DIVISION
MAURICE FAYNE, MOTION TO VACATE
Fed. Reg. No. 73197-019, 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Movant, CRIMINAL ACTION FILE
NO. 1:20-CR-228-MHC-JKL
v.
CIVIL ACTION FILE
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, NO. 1:23-CV-4917-MHC-JKL
Respondent.
ORDER

This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation
(“R&R”) of the Magistrate Judge [Doc. 337] recommending that Movant’s Motion
to Vacate, set Aside, or Correct Sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 be denied
without prejudice for failure to comply with a lawful order of the Court. The Order
for Service of the R&R [Doc. 338] provided notice that, in accordance with 28
U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), Movant was authorized to file objections within fourteen (14)
days of the service of that Order. No objections to the R&R have been filed within
the permitted time period.

Absent objection, the district court judge “may accept, reject, or modify, in

whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge,”
Case 1:20-cr-00228-MHC-JKL Document 339 Filed 05/30/24 Page 2 of 2

28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Based upon the absence of objections to the R&R, in

accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the Court has reviewed the R&R for plain

error. See United States v. Slay, 714 F.2d 1093, 1095 (11th Cir. 1983). The Court
finds no plain error and that the R&R is supported by law.

Consequently, the Court APPROVES AND ADOPTS the Report and
Recommendation [Doc. 337] as the Opinion and Order of the Court. It is hereby
ORDERED that Movant’s Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 [Doc. 326] is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE
for failure to comply with the Magistrate Judge’s Order of March 12, 2024. See
LR 41.3A(2), NDGa.

The Clerk is DIRECTED to close the civil case file.

IT IS SO ORDERED this Zor day of May, 2024.

MARK H. COHEN
United States District Judge


File and source

File
339.pdf
Size
294,079 bytes
SHA-256
19393d03f7bfb7dee50bdffd51c2bb3f74e285c91cc685d2d56f06a7ed85fc8a
Our copy
339.pdf
Original
No public link identified.
Back to top