Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Source documents Order — No. 0:22-cr-60028 (Dkt. 53, S.D. Fla.)

Order — No. 0:22-cr-60028 (Dkt. 53, S.D. Fla.)

Summary

An order in United States v. Luke Joselin, Case No. 22-60028-CR-DIMITROULEAS, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida, entered August 12, 2022 as Document 53 (2 pages). The order denies the defendant's Motion in Limine [DE-49] without prejudice to object at trial. It states that motions in limine are best suited to prevent the mention of prejudicial evidence, the mere mention of which would deny a party a fair trial, and that the Court does not rule in a vacuum or give advisory opinions.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Cite this document

“Order — No. 0:22-cr-60028 (Dkt. 53, S.D. Fla.).” Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/order-no-0-22-cr-60028-dkt-53-s-d-fla-2f50014aac/, SHA-256 62a0bc6eba27223da986d3704d1ceaee9247455feeda48cbe4896583936dde75.

Full text

Case 0:22-cr-60028-WPD Document 53 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/12/2022 Page 1 of 2




                               UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                               SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA


  UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                          CASE NO. 22-60028-CR-DIMITROULEAS

          Plaintiff,

  vs.

  LUKE JOSELIN,

        Defendant.
  _____________________________________/

                                             ORDER

          THIS CAUSE is before the Court on Defendant Luke Joselin’s Motion in Limine DE-

  49], and the Court having considered the motion and being fully advised in the premises, it is

  herby

          ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Motion [DE-49] is Denied without prejudice to

  object at trial. Motions in Limine are best suited to prevent the mention of prejudicial evidence,

  the mere mention of which, would deny a party a fair trial. The Court does not rule in a vacuum

  or give advisory opinions.

          DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Fort Lauderdale, Broward County, Florida, this

  12th day of August, 2022.




  Copies furnished to:

  Counsel of Record
Case 0:22-cr-60028-WPD Document 53 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/12/2022 Page 2 of 2

File and source

File
53.pdf
Size
137,529 bytes
SHA-256
62a0bc6eba27223da986d3704d1ceaee9247455feeda48cbe4896583936dde75
Our copy
53.pdf
Original
No public link identified.
Back to top