Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Source documents Order — No. 0:22-cr-60028 (Dkt. 52, S.D. Fla.)

Order — No. 0:22-cr-60028 (Dkt. 52, S.D. Fla.)

Summary

An order in United States v. Luke Joselin, Case No. 22-60028-CR-DIMITROULEAS, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida, entered August 12, 2022 as Document 52 (2 pages). The order denies the defendant's motion in limine to redact the indictment and to prohibit use of the word "kickback" during trial [DE-50]. It states that Rule 7(d) is strictly construed against striking surplusage unless the allegations are not relevant and are inflammatory and prejudicial, citing U.S. v. Williams, 2008 WL 4867748.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Cite this document

“Order — No. 0:22-cr-60028 (Dkt. 52, S.D. Fla.).” Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/order-no-0-22-cr-60028-dkt-52-s-d-fla-a75f736aa3/, SHA-256 036142f09a9f1c7abaa84f7bff6cb936f1f8b6defc42e3735775659b663e6357.

Full text

Case 0:22-cr-60028-WPD Document 52 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/12/2022 Page 1 of 2




                               UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                               SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA


  UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                           CASE NO. 22-60028-CR-DIMITROULEAS

         Plaintiff,

  vs.

  LUKE JOSELIN,

        Defendant.
  _____________________________________/

                                              ORDER

         THIS CAUSE is before the Court on Defendant Luke Joselin’s Motion in Limine to

  Redact the Indictment and Prohibit Use of the Word “Kickback” During Trial [DE-50], and the

  Court having considered the motion and being fully advised in the premises, it is herby

         ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Motion {DE-50] is Denied. Rule 7(d), Fed R Cr..

  Proc.is strictly construed against striking surplusage unless the allegations are not relevant, and

  are inflammatory and prejudicial. U.S. v. Williams, 2008 WL 4867748 (S.D. Fla 2008).

         DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Fort Lauderdale, Broward County, Florida, this

  12th day of August, 2022.




  Copies furnished to:

  Counsel of Record
Case 0:22-cr-60028-WPD Document 52 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/12/2022 Page 2 of 2

File and source

File
52.pdf
Size
160,459 bytes
SHA-256
036142f09a9f1c7abaa84f7bff6cb936f1f8b6defc42e3735775659b663e6357
Our copy
52.pdf
Original
No public link identified.
Back to top