Order Michael A. Perkins — No. 8:22-cr-00125 (Dkt. 174, D. Neb.)
Summary
Order of the U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska in United States v. Michael A. Perkins, case 8:22-cr-00125, Document 174, dated November 7, 2023, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael D. Nelson. It grants the defendant's motion to extend time to file pretrial motions (Filing No. 173) to December 15, 2023. The time until December 15, 2023 is excluded under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) & (B).
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Cite this document
“Order Michael A. Perkins — No. 8:22-cr-00125 (Dkt. 174, D. Neb.).”
Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/order-michael-a-perkins-no-8-22-cr-00125-dkt-174-d-neb-05929750a1/
, SHA-256 579b23393297dfcb117eab9beb9dca7dc1a918c173cabe3d558dd7fa8a75da48.Full text
8:22-cr-00125-BCB-MDN Doc # 174 Filed: 11/07/23 Page 1 of 1 - Page ID # 441
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff, 8:22CR125
vs.
ORDER
MICHAEL A. PERKINS,
Defendant.
This matter is before the Court on Defendant's Motion to Extend Time to File Pretrial
Motions. (Filing No. 173). The motion is unopposed by the government. For good cause shown, the
Court finds the motion should be granted. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED:
1) Defendant's Motion to Extend Time to File Pretrial Motions, (Filing No. 173), is
granted.
2) Pretrial motions shall be filed by December 15, 2023.
3) In accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A), the Court finds that the ends of justice
will be served by granting this motion and outweigh the interests of the public and the
defendant in a speedy trial. Any additional time arising as a result of the granting of
this motion, that is, the time between today's date and December 15, 2023, shall be
deemed excludable time in any computation of time under the requirement of the
Speedy Trial Act. Failure to grant this motion would deny counsel the reasonable time
necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence,
and the novelty and complexity of the case. The failure to grant this motion might result
in a miscarriage of justice. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) & (B). Failing to timely object
to this order as provided under this court’s local rules will be deemed a waiver of any
right to later claim the time should not have been excluded under the Speedy Trial Act.
Dated this 7th day of November, 2023.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Michael D. Nelson
United States Magistrate Judge
File and source
- File
- 174.pdf
- Size
- 77,202 bytes
- SHA-256
- 579b23393297dfcb117eab9beb9dca7dc1a918c173cabe3d558dd7fa8a75da48
- Our copy
- 174.pdf
- Original
- No public link identified.