Order Megan Louise Andersen — No. 8:21-cr-00014 (Dkt. 16, D. Neb.)
Summary
Order of the U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska in United States v. Megan Louise Andersen, case 8:21-cr-00014, Document 16, dated February 18, 2021, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael D. Nelson. It grants the defendant's motion to extend time to file pretrial motions [15], giving an approximate 14-day extension to March 3, 2021. The time between February 17, 2021 and March 3, 2021 is excluded under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) & (B).
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Cite this document
“Order Megan Louise Andersen — No. 8:21-cr-00014 (Dkt. 16, D. Neb.).”
Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/order-megan-louise-andersen-no-8-21-cr-00014-dkt-16-d-neb-5e294f936a/
, SHA-256 e71d8854df1ff8691266900a38521c1fee86029652dd5383f2789673fee8d09d.Full text
8:21-cr-00014-BCB-MDN Doc # 16 Filed: 02/18/21 Page 1 of 1 - Page ID # 33
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff, 8:21CR14
vs.
ORDER
MEGAN LOUISE ANDERSEN,
Defendant.
This matter is before the court on Defendant's MOTION TO EXTEND TIME WITH
WHICH TO FILE PRETRIAL MOTIONS [15]. For good cause shown, I find that the motion
should be granted. Defendant will be given an approximate 14-day extension. Pretrial Motions
shall be filed by March 3, 2021.
IT IS ORDERED:
1. Defendant's MOTION TO EXTEND TIME WITH WHICH TO FILE PRETRIAL
MOTIONS [15] is granted. Pretrial motions shall be filed on or before March 3, 2021.
2. The ends of justice have been served by granting such motion and outweigh the
interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. The additional time arising as a result
of the granting of the motion, i.e., the time between February 17, 2021, and March 3, 2021, shall
be deemed excludable time in any computation of time under the requirement of the Speedy
Trial Act for the reason defendant's counsel required additional time to adequately prepare the
case, taking into consideration due diligence of counsel, and the novelty and complexity of this
case. The failure to grant additional time might result in a miscarriage of justice. 18 U.S.C. §
3161(h)(7)(A) & (B).
Dated this 18th day of February, 2021.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Michael D. Nelson
United States Magistrate Judge
File and source
- File
- 16.pdf
- Size
- 19,856 bytes
- SHA-256
- e71d8854df1ff8691266900a38521c1fee86029652dd5383f2789673fee8d09d
- Our copy
- 16.pdf
- Original
- No public link identified.