Order Joel G. Anderson — No. 8:23-cr-00102 (Dkt. 30, D. Neb.)
Summary
Order of the U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska in United States v. Joel G. Anderson, case 8:23-cr-00102, Document 30, dated October 17, 2023, signed by Magistrate Judge Susan M. Bazis. It grants the defendant's unopposed motion to extend time to file pretrial motions (Filing No. 29) to November 15, 2023. The time between October 16, 2023 and November 15, 2023 is excluded under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) & (B).
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Cite this document
“Order Joel G. Anderson — No. 8:23-cr-00102 (Dkt. 30, D. Neb.).”
Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/order-joel-g-anderson-no-8-23-cr-00102-dkt-30-d-neb-93a3919983/
, SHA-256 e214e3f7befcfc9ef7b589fb5b2f9ed67eb4544396eaf2d680479c174762528d.Full text
8:23-cr-00102-BCB-SMB Doc # 30 Filed: 10/17/23 Page 1 of 1 - Page ID # 48
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff, 8:23CR102
vs.
ORDER
JOEL G. ANDERSON,
Defendant.
This matter is before the Court on Defendant’s Unopposed Motion to Extend Time to File
Pretrial Motions, (Filing No. 29). For good cause shown, the Court finds the motion should be
granted. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED:
1) Defendant’s Unopposed Motion to Extend Time to File Pretrial Motions, (Filing
No. 29), is granted.
2) Pretrial motions shall be filed by November 15, 2023.
3) In accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A), the Court finds that the ends of
justice will be served by granting this motion and outweigh the interests of the
public and the defendant in a speedy trial. Any additional time arising as a result
of the granting of this motion, that is, the time between October 16, 2023 and
November 15, 2023, shall be deemed excludable time in any computation of time
under the requirement of the Speedy Trial Act. Failure to grant this motion would
deny counsel the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into
account the exercise of due diligence, and the novelty and complexity of the case.
The failure to grant this motion might result in a miscarriage of justice. 18 U.S.C.
§ 3161(h)(7)(A) & (B). Failing to timely object to this order as provided under this
court’s local rules will be deemed a waiver of any right to later claim the time
should not have been excluded under the Speedy Trial Act.
Dated this 17th day of October, 2023.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Susan M. Bazis
United States Magistrate Judge
File and source
- File
- 30.pdf
- Size
- 95,342 bytes
- SHA-256
- e214e3f7befcfc9ef7b589fb5b2f9ed67eb4544396eaf2d680479c174762528d
- Our copy
- 30.pdf
- Original
- No public link identified.