Order Joel G. Anderson — No. 8:23-cr-00102 (Dkt. 28, D. Neb.)
Summary
Order of the U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska in United States v. Joel G. Anderson, case 8:23-cr-00102, Document 28, dated September 15, 2023, signed by Magistrate Judge Susan M. Bazis. It grants the defendant's unopposed motion for extension of the pretrial motions deadline (Filing No. 27) and sets the new deadline as October 16, 2023. The time until that date is excluded under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) & (B), and failure to object timely waives any later challenge to the exclusion.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Cite this document
“Order Joel G. Anderson — No. 8:23-cr-00102 (Dkt. 28, D. Neb.).”
Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/order-joel-g-anderson-no-8-23-cr-00102-dkt-28-d-neb-2b178cfeda/
, SHA-256 deda02eabf00435a974863a36449738fdeaf2cc59a00005d275ddcd3b913c146.Full text
8:23-cr-00102-BCB-SMB Doc # 28 Filed: 09/15/23 Page 1 of 1 - Page ID # 45
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff, 8:23CR102
vs.
ORDER
JOEL G. ANDERSON,
Defendant.
This matter is before the Court on Defendant’s Unopposed Motion for Extension of Pretrial
Motions Deadline, (Filing No. 27). For good cause shown, the Court finds the motion should be
granted. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED:
1) Defendant’s Unopposed Motion for Extension of Pretrial Motions Deadline, (Filing
No. 27), is granted.
2) Pretrial motions shall be filed by October 16, 2023.
3) In accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A), the Court finds that the ends of
justice will be served by granting this motion and outweigh the interests of the
public and the defendant in a speedy trial. Any additional time arising as a result
of the granting of this motion, that is, the time between today’s date and October
16, 2023, shall be deemed excludable time in any computation of time under the
requirement of the Speedy Trial Act. Failure to grant this motion would deny
counsel the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account
the exercise of due diligence, and the novelty and complexity of the case. The
failure to grant this motion might result in a miscarriage of justice. 18 U.S.C. §
3161(h)(7)(A) & (B). Failing to timely object to this order as provided under this
court’s local rules will be deemed a waiver of any right to later claim the time
should not have been excluded under the Speedy Trial Act.
Dated this 15th day of September, 2023.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Susan M. Bazis
United States Magistrate Judge
File and source
- File
- 28.pdf
- Size
- 95,507 bytes
- SHA-256
- deda02eabf00435a974863a36449738fdeaf2cc59a00005d275ddcd3b913c146
- Our copy
- 28.pdf
- Original
- No public link identified.