Order Joel G. Anderson — No. 8:23-cr-00102 (Dkt. 25, D. Neb.)
Summary
Order of the U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska in United States v. Joel G. Anderson, case 8:23-cr-00102, Document 25, dated August 15, 2023, signed by Magistrate Judge Susan M. Bazis. It grants the defendant's unopposed motion for extension of the pretrial motions deadline (Filing No. 24) to September 15, 2023. The time between August 16, 2023 and September 15, 2023 is excluded under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) & (B).
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Cite this document
“Order Joel G. Anderson — No. 8:23-cr-00102 (Dkt. 25, D. Neb.).”
Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/order-joel-g-anderson-no-8-23-cr-00102-dkt-25-d-neb-be4e5b6d82/
, SHA-256 961f91073580774ebf9d3b834ca7a4d97c93637a0451210b43119c16d4c8bcac.Full text
8:23-cr-00102-BCB-SMB Doc # 25 Filed: 08/15/23 Page 1 of 1 - Page ID # 42
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff, 8:23CR102
vs.
ORDER
JOEL G. ANDERSON,
Defendant.
This matter is before the Court on Defendant’s Unopposed Motion for Extension of Pretrial
Motions Deadline, (Filing No. 24). For good cause shown, the Court finds the motion should be
granted. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED:
1) Defendant’s Unopposed Motion for Extension of Pretrial Motions Deadline, (Filing
No. 24), is granted.
2) Pretrial motions shall be filed by September 15, 2023.
3) In accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A), the Court finds that the ends of justice
will be served by granting this motion and outweigh the interests of the public and the
defendant in a speedy trial. Any additional time arising as a result of the granting of
this motion, that is, the time between August 16, 2023 and September 15, 2023, shall
be deemed excludable time in any computation of time under the requirement of the
Speedy Trial Act. Failure to grant this motion would deny counsel the reasonable time
necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence,
and the novelty and complexity of the case. The failure to grant this motion might result
in a miscarriage of justice. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) & (B). Failing to timely object
to this order as provided under this court’s local rules will be deemed a waiver of any
right to later claim the time should not have been excluded under the Speedy Trial Act.
Dated this 15th day of August, 2023.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Susan M. Bazis
United States Magistrate Judge
File and source
- File
- 25.pdf
- Size
- 95,257 bytes
- SHA-256
- 961f91073580774ebf9d3b834ca7a4d97c93637a0451210b43119c16d4c8bcac
- Our copy
- 25.pdf
- Original
- No public link identified.