Order Joel G. Anderson — No. 8:23-cr-00102 (Dkt. 23, D. Neb.)
Summary
Order of the U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska in United States v. Joel G. Anderson, case 8:23-cr-00102, Document 23, dated July 18, 2023, signed by Magistrate Judge Susan M. Bazis. It grants the defendant's unopposed motion for extension of the pretrial motions deadline [22], giving an approximate 30-day extension to August 16, 2023. The time between July 17, 2023 and August 16, 2023 is excluded under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) & (B).
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Cite this document
“Order Joel G. Anderson — No. 8:23-cr-00102 (Dkt. 23, D. Neb.).”
Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/order-joel-g-anderson-no-8-23-cr-00102-dkt-23-d-neb-0c953bf5bb/
, SHA-256 e6dd42f5adcec5a8d9ae1ef76280753d1b5f03acd84eb6a8331170abe00a0909.Full text
8:23-cr-00102-BCB-SMB Doc # 23 Filed: 07/18/23 Page 1 of 1 - Page ID # 40
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff, 8:23CR102
vs.
ORDER
JOEL G. ANDERSON,
Defendant.
This matter is before the court on Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Pretrial
Motions Deadline [22]. For good cause shown, I find that the motion should be granted. Defendant
will be given an approximate 30-day extension. Pretrial Motions shall be filed by August 16, 2023.
IT IS ORDERED:
1. Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Pretrial Motions Deadline [22] is
granted. Pretrial motions shall be filed on or before August 16, 2023.
2. The ends of justice have been served by granting such motion and outweigh the
interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. The additional time arising as a result of
the granting of the motion, i.e., the time between July 17, 2023 and August 16, 2023, shall be
deemed excludable time in any computation of time under the requirement of the Speedy Trial Act
for the reason defendant's counsel required additional time to adequately prepare the case, taking
into consideration due diligence of counsel, and the novelty and complexity of this case. The
failure to grant additional time might result in a miscarriage of justice. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A)
& (B).
Dated this 18th day of July, 2023.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Susan M. Bazis
United States Magistrate Judge
File and source
- File
- 23.pdf
- Size
- 80,927 bytes
- SHA-256
- e6dd42f5adcec5a8d9ae1ef76280753d1b5f03acd84eb6a8331170abe00a0909
- Our copy
- 23.pdf
- Original
- No public link identified.