Order Joel G. Anderson — No. 8:23-cr-00102 (Dkt. 21, D. Neb.)
Summary
Order of the U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska in United States v. Joel G. Anderson, case 8:23-cr-00102, Document 21, dated June 12, 2023, signed by Magistrate Judge Susan M. Bazis. It grants the defendant's motion for extension of the pretrial motions deadline [20], giving an approximate 30-day extension to July 17, 2023. The time between June 15, 2023 and July 17, 2023 is excluded under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) & (B).
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Cite this document
“Order Joel G. Anderson — No. 8:23-cr-00102 (Dkt. 21, D. Neb.).”
Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/order-joel-g-anderson-no-8-23-cr-00102-dkt-21-d-neb-dd92955e07/
, SHA-256 70f7395af8c2557d9dfed2e7ba6e87f35e777c1bc6314d1d70b44ad6d62d2006.Full text
8:23-cr-00102-BCB-SMB Doc # 21 Filed: 06/12/23 Page 1 of 1 - Page ID # 37
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff, 8:23CR102
vs.
ORDER
JOEL G. ANDERSON,
Defendant.
This matter is before the court on Defendant's Motion for Extension of Pretrial Motions
Deadline [20]. For good cause shown, I find that the motion should be granted. Defendant will
be given an approximate 30-day extension. Pretrial Motions shall be filed by July 17, 2023.
IT IS ORDERED:
1. Defendant's Motion for Extension of Pretrial Motions Deadline [20] is granted.
Pretrial motions shall be filed on or before July 17, 2023.
2. The ends of justice have been served by granting such motion and outweigh the
interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. The additional time arising as a result
of the granting of the motion, i.e., the time between June 15, 2023, and July 17, 2023, shall be
deemed excludable time in any computation of time under the requirement of the Speedy Trial
Act for the reason defendant's counsel required additional time to adequately prepare the case,
taking into consideration due diligence of counsel, and the novelty and complexity of this case.
The failure to grant additional time might result in a miscarriage of justice. 18 U.S.C. §
3161(h)(7)(A) & (B).
Dated this 12th day of June, 2023.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Susan M. Bazis
United States Magistrate Judge
File and source
- File
- 21.pdf
- Size
- 19,651 bytes
- SHA-256
- 70f7395af8c2557d9dfed2e7ba6e87f35e777c1bc6314d1d70b44ad6d62d2006
- Our copy
- 21.pdf
- Original
- No public link identified.