Order Joel G. Anderson — No. 8:23-cr-00102 (Dkt. 18, D. Neb.)
Summary
Order of the U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska in United States v. Joel G. Anderson, case 8:23-cr-00102, Document 18, dated May 17, 2023, signed by Magistrate Judge Susan M. Bazis. It grants the defendant's motion for extension of the pretrial motions deadline [17], giving an approximate 30-day extension to June 15, 2023. The time between May 16, 2023 and June 15, 2023 is excluded under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) & (B).
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Cite this document
“Order Joel G. Anderson — No. 8:23-cr-00102 (Dkt. 18, D. Neb.).”
Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/order-joel-g-anderson-no-8-23-cr-00102-dkt-18-d-neb-65b1a18fe8/
, SHA-256 d87393f70a068b1d971d7d16a172e4780a949d23684b30c887a6bed684691c3b.Full text
8:23-cr-00102-BCB-SMB Doc # 18 Filed: 05/17/23 Page 1 of 1 - Page ID # 33
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff, 8:23CR102
vs.
ORDER
JOEL G. ANDERSON,
Defendant.
This matter is before the court on Defendant's Motion for Extension of Pretrial Motions
Deadline [17]. For good cause shown, I find that the motion should be granted. Defendant will be
given an approximate 30-day extension. Pretrial Motions shall be filed by June 15, 2023.
IT IS ORDERED:
1. Defendant's Motion for Extension of Pretrial Motions Deadline [17] is granted.
Pretrial motions shall be filed on or before June 15, 2023.
2. The ends of justice have been served by granting such motion and outweigh the
interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. The additional time arising as a result of
the granting of the motion, i.e., the time between May 16, 2023 and June 15, 2023, shall be deemed
excludable time in any computation of time under the requirement of the Speedy Trial Act for the
reason defendant's counsel required additional time to adequately prepare the case, taking into
consideration due diligence of counsel, and the novelty and complexity of this case. The failure to
grant additional time might result in a miscarriage of justice. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) & (B).
Dated this 17th day of May, 2023.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Susan M. Bazis
United States Magistrate Judge
File and source
- File
- 18.pdf
- Size
- 81,355 bytes
- SHA-256
- d87393f70a068b1d971d7d16a172e4780a949d23684b30c887a6bed684691c3b
- Our copy
- 18.pdf
- Original
- No public link identified.