Order Jermaine Lewis — No. 8:21-cr-00290 (Dkt. 18, D. Neb.)
Summary
Order of the U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska in United States v. Jermaine Lewis, case 8:21-cr-00290, Document 18, dated January 11, 2022, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael D. Nelson. It grants the defendant's unopposed motion to extend time to file pretrial motions [17], giving an approximate 30-day extension to February 9, 2022. The time between January 10, 2022 and February 9, 2022 is excluded under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) & (B).
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Cite this document
“Order Jermaine Lewis — No. 8:21-cr-00290 (Dkt. 18, D. Neb.).”
Original at archive.org. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/order-jermaine-lewis-no-8-21-cr-00290-dkt-18-d-neb-80ed4b8d02/
, SHA-256 5818b1b53b4b138a19d7a25b0466b83cbe98085e9b18f7ee44347ba3125ad04a.Full text
8:21-cr-00290-RFR-MDN Doc # 18 Filed: 01/11/22 Page 1 of 1 - Page ID # 30
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff, 8:21CR290
vs.
ORDER
JERMAINE LEWIS,
Defendants.
This matter is before the court on Defendant's UNOPPOSED MOTION TO EXTEND
TIME TO FILE PRETRIAL MOTIONS [17]. For good cause shown, I find that the motion
should be granted. Defendant will be given an approximate 30-day extension. Pretrial Motions
shall be filed by February 9, 2022.
IT IS ORDERED:
1. Defendant's UNOPPOSED MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE PRETRIAL
MOTIONS [17] is granted. Pretrial motions shall be filed on or before February 9, 2022.
2. The ends of justice have been served by granting such motion and outweigh the
interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. The additional time arising as a result
of the granting of the motion, i.e., the time between January 10, 2022, and February 9, 2022,
shall be deemed excludable time in any computation of time under the requirement of the Speedy
Trial Act for the reason defendant's counsel required additional time to adequately prepare the
case, taking into consideration due diligence of counsel, and the novelty and complexity of this
case. The failure to grant additional time might result in a miscarriage of justice. 18 U.S.C. §
3161(h)(7)(A) & (B).
Dated this 11th day of January, 2022.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Michael D. Nelson
United States Magistrate Judge
File and source
- File
- 18.pdf
- Size
- 19,518 bytes
- SHA-256
- 5818b1b53b4b138a19d7a25b0466b83cbe98085e9b18f7ee44347ba3125ad04a
- Our copy
- 18.pdf
- Original
- archive.org