Order Jermaine Lewis — No. 8:21-cr-00290 (Dkt. 16, D. Neb.)
Summary
Order of the U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska in United States v. Jermaine Lewis, case 8:21-cr-00290, Document 16, dated December 7, 2021, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael D. Nelson. It grants the defendant's unopposed motion for extension of the pretrial motions deadline [15], giving an approximate 30-day extension to January 10, 2022. The time between December 9, 2021 and January 10, 2022 is excluded under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) & (B).
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Cite this document
“Order Jermaine Lewis — No. 8:21-cr-00290 (Dkt. 16, D. Neb.).”
Original at archive.org. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/order-jermaine-lewis-no-8-21-cr-00290-dkt-16-d-neb-97b1cdf1d1/
, SHA-256 6cc0d49d4a09487582cf45296f16d5785395aef3c5cb9c3c8eb315100b8882f4.Full text
8:21-cr-00290-RFR-MDN Doc # 16 Filed: 12/07/21 Page 1 of 1 - Page ID # 27
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff, 8:21CR290
vs.
ORDER
JERMAINE LEWIS,
Defendant.
This matter is before the court on Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Pretrial
Motions Deadline [15]. For good cause shown, I find that the motion should be granted. Defendant
will be given an approximate 30-day extension. Pretrial Motions shall be filed by January 10, 2022.
IT IS ORDERED:
1. Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Pretrial Motions Deadline [15] is
granted. Pretrial motions shall be filed on or before January 10, 2022.
2. The ends of justice have been served by granting such motion and outweigh the
interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. The additional time arising as a result of
the granting of the motion, i.e., the time between December 9, 2021 and January 10, 2022, shall
be deemed excludable time in any computation of time under the requirement of the Speedy Trial
Act for the reason defendant's counsel required additional time to adequately prepare the case,
taking into consideration due diligence of counsel, and the novelty and complexity of this case.
The failure to grant additional time might result in a miscarriage of justice. 18 U.S.C. §
3161(h)(7)(A) & (B).
Dated this 7th day of December, 2021.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Michael D. Nelson
United States Magistrate Judge
File and source
- File
- 16.pdf
- Size
- 81,298 bytes
- SHA-256
- 6cc0d49d4a09487582cf45296f16d5785395aef3c5cb9c3c8eb315100b8882f4
- Our copy
- 16.pdf
- Original
- archive.org