Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Source documents Order Granting Stipulated Motions for Protective Order and Motion to Expedite; and Protective Order — No. 4:23-cr-06028 (Dkt. 24, E.D. Wash.)

Order Granting Stipulated Motions for Protective Order and Motion to Expedite; and Protective Order — No. 4:23-cr-06028 (Dkt. 24, E.D. Wash.)

Summary

Order Granting Stipulated Motions for Protective Order and Motion to Expedite, and Protective Order, ECF No. 24 filed October 5, 2023 in United States v. Lucas Daniel Murphy, No. 4:23-CR-06028-MKD in the Eastern District of Washington. The parties stipulated (ECF No. 21) to computer forensic review procedures for discovery the United States says contains child pornography contraband as defined in 18 U.S.C. § 2256(8), and asked (ECF No. 22) for an order barring public disclosure of the alleged child victim's identity under 18 U.S.C. § 3509(d)(3), with a motion to expedite (ECF No. 23). Mary K. Dimke, United States District Judge, finds good cause under Fed. R. Crim. P. 16(d)(1), grants all three motions, and enters a protective order that keeps the victim's identity, images and personal identifying information confidential to the defense team.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Cite this document

“Order Granting Stipulated Motions for Protective Order and Motion to Expedite; and Protective Order — No. 4:23-cr-06028 (Dkt. 24, E.D. Wash.).” Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/order-granting-stipulated-motions-for-protective-order-and-motion-to-e-9a20e010ec/, SHA-256 52f0a79e6d31623457a0b447d0566b4e9deac3757aabfd2dc1b9cfa4cda960c5.

Full text

       Case 4:23-cr-06028-MKD     ECF No. 24    filed 10/05/23   PageID.75 Page 1 of 9



                                                                            FILED IN THE
                                                                        U.S. DISTRICT COURT
 1                                                                EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON



 2                                                                 Oct 05, 2023
                                                                       SEAN F. MCAVOY, CLERK

 3

 4

 5                        UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

 6                      EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

 7   UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                  No. 4:23-CR-06028-MKD

 8                            Plaintiff,        ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED
                                                MOTIONS FOR PROTECTIVE
 9               v.                             ORDER AND MOTION TO
                                                EXPEDITE; AND PROTECTIVE
10   LUCAS DANIEL MURPHY                        ORDER

11                            Defendant.        ECF Nos. 21, 22, 23

12

13         Before the Court is the parties’ Stipulated Motion for Protective Order

14   Regarding Computer Forensic Review Procedures, ECF No. 21, Stipulated Motion

15   for Protective Order Regarding Identification of Minor Victim, ECF No. 22, and

16   related Motion to Expedite, ECF No. 23.

17         The United States indicates that the discovery in this matter contains

18   materials constituting child pornography contraband as defined in 18 U.S.C.

19   § 2256(8). The parties seek a protective order establishing computer forensic

20

     ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTIONS FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER;
     AND PROTECTIVE ORDER – 1
       Case 4:23-cr-06028-MKD      ECF No. 24    filed 10/05/23   PageID.76 Page 2 of 9




 1   review procedures for material constituting child pornography, pursuant to 18

 2   U.S.C. § 3509(m). ECF No. 21 at 1-2. The parties stipulate to certain procedures

 3   that will make such material reasonably available to Defendant, as required by 18

 4   U.S.C. § 3509(m)(2). ECF No. 21 at 3-5.

 5         Further, the parties seek a protective order against public disclosure of the

 6   identity of the child victim in this case, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3509(d)(3). ECF

 7   No. 22 at 1. The parties stipulate that the discovery in this case includes the

 8   identity, image, and personal identifying information of an alleged child victim.

 9   ECF No. 22 at 2. Counsel for the United States indicates that the requested

10   protective order is necessary to protect the alleged child victim’s privacy, welfare,

11   and reputation and to minimize the emotional trauma and personal embarrassment

12   that would likely result from public disclosure of her identity. ECF No. 22 at 4-5.

13   The parties stipulate that the provisions of the requested order are appropriate in

14   the circumstances of this case and under the requirements of 18 U.S.C. § 3509.

15   ECF No. 22 at 5.

16         The Court has reviewed the unopposed motions and the record and is fully

17   informed. The Court finds good cause under Fed. R. Crim. P. 16(d)(1) for a

18   protective order to issue in this matter. The Court further finds that this case

19   involves a child, as defined by 18 U.S.C. § 3509(a)(2); that there is a significant

20

     ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTIONS FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER;
     AND PROTECTIVE ORDER – 2
       Case 4:23-cr-06028-MKD      ECF No. 24    filed 10/05/23   PageID.77 Page 3 of 9




 1   possibility that public disclosure of the child’s identity would be detrimental to the

 2   child; and that the requested order is necessary to protect the privacy of the child.

 3   18 U.S.C. § 3509(d)(3)(A), (B)(ii).

 4         Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED:

 5      1. The Stipulated Motion for Protective Order Regarding Computer Forensic

 6         Review Procedures, ECF No. 21, is GRANTED.

 7      2. The Stipulated Motion for Protective Order Regarding Identification of

 8         Minor Victim, ECF No. 22, is GRANTED.

 9      3. The United States’ Motion to Expedite, ECF No. 23, is GRANTED.

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

     ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTIONS FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER;
     AND PROTECTIVE ORDER – 3
       Case 4:23-cr-06028-MKD      ECF No. 24    filed 10/05/23   PageID.78 Page 4 of 9




 1                                 PROTECTIVE ORDER

 2         1.      For the purposes of this Order, the term “Defense Team” shall refer

 3   solely to Defendant’s counsel of record, Defendant’s designated expert, and a

 4   defense investigator.

 5         2.      This Order shall automatically apply to any subsequent counsel of

 6   record, designated expert, and defense investigator for Defendant.

 7         3.      This Order shall automatically apply to the bona fide identity, images,

 8   and personal identifying information (PII) of any child identified over the course of

 9   this case, whether or not that child is known to the United States or Defendant at

10   the time of this Order.

11         4.      The protections in this Order shall continue to apply to any child who

12   attains the age of 18 during the pendency of this case.

13         5.      The United States shall make reasonably available to Defendant all

14   material constituting child pornography in this case in accordance with the

15   following procedures.

16              a. The United States will make a forensic copy or “image” of devices

17                 and media containing alleged child pornography contraband at issue

18                 in this case. The United States will make full forensic images

19                 reasonably available to Defendant and provide ample opportunity for

20

     ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTIONS FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER;
     AND PROTECTIVE ORDER – 4
      Case 4:23-cr-06028-MKD    ECF No. 24    filed 10/05/23   PageID.79 Page 5 of 9




 1             Defense Team to examine them at a government facility in Spokane,

 2             Washington. The United States will also work with Defendant’s

 3             counsel to make reasonably available a working copy of contraband

 4             material at the offices of Homeland Security Investigations in

 5             Richland, Washington.

 6          b. The parties may readdress the Court if there is a need for additional or

 7             after-hours access during the course of litigation, in the event trial or

 8             motion hearings require additional forensic review.

 9          c. Defense Team’s examination of the forensic images in Spokane

10             and/or Richland may be conducted in an interview room monitored by

11             closed-circuit television (CC-TV), without audio feed. If so, the CC-

12             TV without audio feed will be used to ensure the integrity of

13             government-agency space and the security of its occupants, and shall

14             not be of sufficient detail or at an angle that would reveal defense

15             strategy.

16          d. The United States and its agents will make no attempt to record any

17             audio from the workstation nor to observe Defense Team’s work

18             product or computer monitor screen at any time. The defense expert

19

20

     ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTIONS FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER;
     AND PROTECTIVE ORDER – 5
      Case 4:23-cr-06028-MKD    ECF No. 24    filed 10/05/23    PageID.80 Page 6 of 9




 1             may review the feed to ensure that defense strategy is not being

 2             compromised at any time while conducting the forensic review.

 3          e. Defense Team shall not make, nor permit to be made, any copies of

 4             the alleged child pornography contraband pursuant to this Order, nor

 5             shall they remove any contraband images from the government

 6             facility.

 7          f. The defense expert shall be allowed to copy any file that is not

 8             contraband and compile a report (without contraband images/videos)

 9             documenting the examination on removable media at the defense

10             expert’s discretion.

11          g. Defense Team shall leave at the government facility any equipment,

12             including hard drives, which contain child pornography contraband

13             that is identified during forensic evaluation.

14          h. For the purposes of trial, the United States will make available a

15             digital copy of any United States trial exhibit that contains

16             contraband, which will be kept in the custody and control of the case

17             agent. Upon reasonable notice by Defense Counsel, the case agent

18             will also maintain for trial digital copies of any proposed defense

19             exhibit that contains contraband. If Defense Team intends to offer,

20

     ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTIONS FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER;
     AND PROTECTIVE ORDER – 6
       Case 4:23-cr-06028-MKD       ECF No. 24    filed 10/05/23   PageID.81 Page 7 of 9




 1                 publish, or otherwise utilize any government or defense exhibit

 2                 contained on the digital copy maintained by the case agent during

 3                 trial, the case agent shall assist Defense Team in publishing or

 4                 utilizing the exhibit that contains contraband upon reasonable

 5                 notification from Defense Team.

 6         6.      All persons acting in this case in a capacity described in 18 U.S.C.

 7   § 3509(d)(1)(B), shall:

 8              a. Keep all documents that disclose the names, identities, PII, or any

 9                 other information concerning a child in a secure place to which no

10                 person who does not have reason to know their contents has access;

11              b. Disclose such documents or the information in them that concerns a

12                 child only to persons who, by reason of their participation in the

13                 proceeding, have reason to know such information;

14              c. Not permit Defendant to review discovery outside the presence of

15                 Defense Counsel or a defense investigator; and

16              d. Not permit Defendant to keep discovery in their own possession

17                 outside the presence of Defense Counsel or a defense investigator; and

18              e. Not permit Defendant to keep, copy, or record the identities of any

19                 child identified in discovery in this case.

20

     ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTIONS FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER;
     AND PROTECTIVE ORDER – 7
      Case 4:23-cr-06028-MKD    ECF No. 24    filed 10/05/23   PageID.82 Page 8 of 9




 1       7. All papers to be filed in Court that disclose the names or any other

 2          information identifying or concerning a child shall be filed under seal

 3          without needing to obtain a Court order. The filing party shall submit to

 4          the Clerk of the Court:

 5          a. The complete paper to be kept under seal; and

 6          b. The paper with redactions of the portions that disclose the names or

 7             other information identifying or concerning children, to be placed in

 8             the public record.

 9       8. The parties and the witnesses shall not disclose the identity of any alleged

10          child victim during any proceedings connected with this case.

11          a. The parties and witnesses will refer to alleged child victims only by

12             using agreed-upon initials or pseudonyms (e.g., “Minor Victim 1”),

13             rather than their bona fide names, in motions practice, opening

14             statements, during the presentation of evidence, in closing arguments,

15             and during sentencing.

16       9. The United States may produce discovery to Defendant that discloses the

17          bona fide identity, images, and PII of the alleged child victim, in order to

18          comply with the United States’ discovery obligations. Defendant,

19

20

     ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTIONS FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER;
     AND PROTECTIVE ORDER – 8
       Case 4:23-cr-06028-MKD       ECF No. 24    filed 10/05/23   PageID.83 Page 9 of 9




 1              Defense Team, and all of their externs, employees, and/or staff members,

 2              shall keep this information confidential as set forth above.

 3         IT IS SO ORDERED. The Clerk’s Office is directed to enter this Order

 4   and provide copies to all counsel, the U.S. Probation Office, and the U.S. Marshals

 5   Service.

 6         DATED October 5, 2023.

 7
                                    s/Mary K. Dimke
 8                                 MARY K. DIMKE
                            UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
 9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

     ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTIONS FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER;
     AND PROTECTIVE ORDER – 9


File and source

File
24.pdf
Size
112,464 bytes
SHA-256
52f0a79e6d31623457a0b447d0566b4e9deac3757aabfd2dc1b9cfa4cda960c5
Our copy
24.pdf
Original
No public link identified.
Back to top