Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Order — DV Diamond Club v. SBA (Dkt. 47, E.D. Mich.)Search ⌕

Source documents · Archived capture

Order — DV Diamond Club v. SBA (Dkt. 47, E.D. Mich.)

Summary

Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Defendants' Emergency Motion for a Stay (ECF No. 45) in DV Diamond Club of Flint, LLC v. United States Small Business Administration, Case No. 20-cv-10899, in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, signed by Judge Matthew F. Leitman on May 13, 2020 as ECF No. 47. The order denies the defendants' request to stay the court's preliminary injunction pending appeal, finding they have not shown a likelihood of success or irreparable injury. It reasons that because loan guarantees are made on a first-come, first-serve basis, a stay could foreclose the plaintiffs and intervenors from the PPP even if they win on appeal. The court grants an additional 36 hours to comply, setting a deadline of 11:59 p.m. on May 15, 2020, while the defendants seek a stay from the Sixth Circuit.

Summary drafted by a model from the text of the original file linked on this page and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Archived source document. Preserved source.

View original PDF · 135 KB

Original: archive.org

Record facts

File name47-order-granting-in-part-and-denying-in-part-defendants-45-eme.pdf
SHA-256d38acb6cb5af926fd1bb9edcadcdb422140bea1b96f115df6afd3a6e37ca4656
Size138,411 bytes
Source sitearchive.org

File and source

File
47-order-granting-in-part-and-denying-in-part-defendants-45-eme.pdf
Size
138,411 bytes
SHA-256
d38acb6cb5af926fd1bb9edcadcdb422140bea1b96f115df6afd3a6e37ca4656
Our copy
47-order-granting-in-part-and-denying-in-part-defendants-45-eme.pdf
Original
archive.org
Back to top