Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Source documents Preliminary Order of Forfeiture as to Hayat Mohamed Nur (8) — USA v. Farah et al (Dkt. 701, D. Minn.)

Preliminary Order of Forfeiture as to Hayat Mohamed Nur (8) — USA v. Farah et al (Dkt. 701, D. Minn.)

Summary

Preliminary Order of Forfeiture in United States of America v. Hayat Mohamed Nur (8), Case No. 22-cr-124 (NEB/DTS), United States District Court for the District of Minnesota, Doc. 701 filed October 29, 2024. The order grants the United States' Motion (ECF No. 695), citing the Superseding Indictment, the evidence admitted at trial, and the jury's verdict of guilty on Counts 1, 10, and 11. It enters a money judgment forfeiture of $31,130, with credit for the net forfeited value of each asset, and orders forfeiture of property derived from proceeds of the fraud scheme and conspiracy alleged in Counts 1, 10, and 11. The order states that it becomes final as to the defendant at sentencing and bears the signature notation s/Nancy E. Brasel.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Cite this document

“Preliminary Order of Forfeiture as to Hayat Mohamed Nur (8) — USA v. Farah et al (Dkt. 701, D. Minn.).” Original at ecf.mnd.uscourts.gov. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/order-granting-695-motion-for-preliminary-order-of-forfeiture-as-to-ha-0f26ea28f1/, SHA-256 e79fa350ef8d0ec6d1be75de6ced757a8c47f7b2d4fd645d363211b7a2d6ce43.

Full text

        CASE 0:22-cr-00124-NEB-DTS       Doc. 701     Filed 10/29/24   Page 1 of 3




                         UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                            DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
                                                    Case No. 22‐cr‐124 (NEB/DTS)
                      Plaintiff,

         v.                                           PRELIMINARY ORDER OF
                                                           FORFEITURE
 HAYAT MOHAMED NUR (8),

                      Defendant.

        Based on the United States’ Motion for a Preliminary Order of Forfeiture, (ECF

No. 695); on the Superseding Indictment, (ECF No. 57); on the evidence admitted at trial

in this matter; on the Jury’s verdict of Guilty on Counts 1, 10, and 11 of the Superseding

Indictment, (ECF No. 563); on the Declaration of Lacramioara Blackwell, (ECF No. 696);

and on the Court having found that certain property is subject to forfeiture pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 981(a)(1)(C) in conjunction with 28 U.S.C. Section 2461(c), the United

States has established the requisite nexus between such property and the offenses to

which Defendant Hayat Mohamed Nur has been found guilty, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED

that:

        1.    The United States’ Motion for a Preliminary Order of Forfeiture (ECF

No. 695) is GRANTED;

        2.    A money judgment forfeiture is ENTERED against Defendant Hayat

Mohamed Nur pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 981(a)(1)(C) and 28 U.S.C. Section 2461(c) in

the amount $31,130;
      CASE 0:22-cr-00124-NEB-DTS           Doc. 701    Filed 10/29/24     Page 2 of 3




       3.     Defendant Hayat Mohamed Nur shall receive a credit against the money

judgment forfeiture for the net forfeited value of each asset that is forfeited from her in

connection with this case;

       4.     Defendant Hayat Mohamed Nur is ORDERED to forfeit, pursuant to 18

U.S.C. § 981(a)(1)(C), 28 U.S.C. § 2461(c), and Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.2(b)(2)(C), any property,

real or personal, constituting or derived from, any proceeds obtained, directly or

indirectly, as a result of the fraud scheme and conspiracy alleged in Counts 1, 10, and 11

of the Superseding Indictment;

       5.     Pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.2(b)(3) and (c)(1)(B), and 21 U.S.C.

Section 853(m), the United States may conduct discovery as to Defendant Hayat

Mohamed Nur to identify property subject to forfeiture under the terms of this order and

to address any factual issues raised by a third‐party petition filed pursuant to Fed. R.

Crim. P. 32.2(c);

       6.     Pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.2(b)(4)(A) and (B), this Preliminary Order of

Forfeiture shall become final as to Defendant Hayat Mohamed Nur at the time of

sentencing, and shall be made a part of the sentence and included in the judgment; and




                                             2
      CASE 0:22-cr-00124-NEB-DTS         Doc. 701      Filed 10/29/24    Page 3 of 3




      7.     This Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce this Order, and to amend it as

necessary pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.2(e).




Dated: October 29, 2024                           BY THE COURT:

                                                  s/Nancy E. Brasel
                                                  Nancy E. Brasel
                                                  United States District Judge




                                            3

File and source

File
701-order-granting-695-motion-for-preliminary-order-of-forfeitur.pdf
Size
126,344 bytes
SHA-256
e79fa350ef8d0ec6d1be75de6ced757a8c47f7b2d4fd645d363211b7a2d6ce43
Our copy
701-order-granting-695-motion-for-preliminary-order-of-forfeitur.pdf
Original
PACER (login required)
Back to top