Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Order denying 59 Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis on Appeal — No. 1:21-cv-00748 (Dkt. 95)Search ⌕

Source documents · Archived capture

Order denying 59 Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis on Appeal — No. 1:21-cv-00748 (Dkt. 95)

Summary

An order of U.S. District Judge Steven J. McAuliffe in Natasha Marie Athens v. Bank of America, N.A., and Meghan Scholz, Case No. 21-cv-748-SM, in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Hampshire, dated February 4, 2022 and filed as Document 95. It rules on five motions (Doc. Nos. 59, 63-1, 82, 85, 86-1) seeking leave to proceed in forma pauperis in the plaintiff's interlocutory appeals, assigned First Circuit Case Nos. 21-1964, 21-1965, 22-1004, 22-1083 and 22-1084. Applying the objective good faith standard of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), the court finds each appeal frivolous or lacking any arguable basis in law or fact. It certifies that the appeals are not taken in good faith and denies each motion.

Summary drafted by a model from the text of the original file linked on this page and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Archived source document. Preserved source.

View original PDF · 120 KB

Original: archive.org

Record facts

File name95-order-denying-59-motion-to-proceed-in-forma-pauperis-on-appe.pdf
SHA-2569d3d46c56e73d41d6925bd091232936671947ff1b52eddd69b63336aa08134d6
Size122,715 bytes
Source sitearchive.org

File and source

File
95-order-denying-59-motion-to-proceed-in-forma-pauperis-on-appe.pdf
Size
122,715 bytes
SHA-256
9d3d46c56e73d41d6925bd091232936671947ff1b52eddd69b63336aa08134d6
Our copy
95-order-denying-59-motion-to-proceed-in-forma-pauperis-on-appe.pdf
Original
archive.org
Back to top