Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Order — Athens v. Bank of America (Dkt. 7, D.N.H.)Search ⌕

Source documents · Archived capture

Order — Athens v. Bank of America (Dkt. 7, D.N.H.)

Summary

An order filed September 14, 2021 as Document 7 in Natasha Athens, d/b/a Favorite Things v. Bank of America and Megan Scholz, Case No. 21-cv-748-SM, in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Hampshire. The order describes the suit as alleging that Bank of America and BOA Senior Vice President Megan Scholz committed fraud in administering COVID-19 pandemic-related loans, and notes that neither defendant has been served because preliminary review under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2) is not complete. Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(b)(1), the court finds that Athens has not shown an attempt to notify Scholz or verified that immediate and irreparable harm would result. The motion to freeze Scholz's assets (Doc. No. 4) is denied by United States District Judge Steven J. McAuliffe.

Summary drafted by a model from the text of the original file linked on this page and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Archived source document. Preserved source.

View original PDF · 106 KB

Original: archive.org

Record facts

File name7-order-denying-4-motion-under-rule-65-to-freeze-the-assets-of.pdf
SHA-25611a1a9044867ae3f591961853d3338e025a8503c84c98d39897942ee42f789ca
Size108,035 bytes
Source sitearchive.org

File and source

File
7-order-denying-4-motion-under-rule-65-to-freeze-the-assets-of.pdf
Size
108,035 bytes
SHA-256
11a1a9044867ae3f591961853d3338e025a8503c84c98d39897942ee42f789ca
Our copy
7-order-denying-4-motion-under-rule-65-to-freeze-the-assets-of.pdf
Original
archive.org
Back to top