Order Davida J. Anderson — No. 8:21-cr-00253 (Dkt. 139, D. Neb.)
Summary
Order of the U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska in United States v. Davida J. Anderson, case 8:21-cr-00253, Document 139, dated December 21, 2022, signed by Magistrate Judge Susan M. Bazis. It grants the defendant's motion to extend time to file pretrial motions [137], giving an approximate 60-day extension to February 27, 2023. The time between December 20, 2022 and February 27, 2023 is excluded under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) & (B).
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Cite this document
“Order Davida J. Anderson — No. 8:21-cr-00253 (Dkt. 139, D. Neb.).”
Original at archive.org. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/order-davida-j-anderson-no-8-21-cr-00253-dkt-139-d-neb-04b2d3b5ad/
, SHA-256 809b75db173ddce1136be02ebc51af5da61f417f25b8adf5fe5f9fb1dbb0cf1e.Full text
8:21-cr-00253-RFR-SMB Doc # 139 Filed: 12/21/22 Page 1 of 1 - Page ID # 421
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff, 8:21CR253
vs.
ORDER
DAVIDA J. ANDERSON,
Defendant.
This matter is before the court on Defendant's Motion to Extend Time to File Pretrial
Motions [137]. For good cause shown, I find that the motion should be granted. Defendant will
be given an approximate 60-day extension. Pretrial Motions shall be filed by February 27, 2023.
IT IS ORDERED:
1. Defendant's Motion to Extend Time to File Pretrial Motions [137] is granted.
Pretrial motions shall be filed on or before February 27, 2023.
2. The ends of justice have been served by granting such motion and outweigh the
interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. The additional time arising as a result
of the granting of the motion, i.e., the time between December 20, 2022 and February 27, 2023,
shall be deemed excludable time in any computation of time under the requirement of the Speedy
Trial Act for the reason defendant's counsel required additional time to adequately prepare the
case, taking into consideration due diligence of counsel, and the novelty and complexity of this
case. The failure to grant additional time might result in a miscarriage of justice. 18 U.S.C. §
3161(h)(7)(A) & (B).
Dated this 21st day of December, 2022.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Susan M. Bazis
United States Magistrate Judge
File and source
- File
- 139.pdf
- Size
- 20,095 bytes
- SHA-256
- 809b75db173ddce1136be02ebc51af5da61f417f25b8adf5fe5f9fb1dbb0cf1e
- Our copy
- 139.pdf
- Original
- archive.org