Order Brenda K. Banks — No. 8:22-cr-00111 (Dkt. 17, D. Neb.)
Summary
Order of the U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska in United States v. Brenda K. Banks, case 8:22-cr-00111, Document 17, dated August 4, 2022, signed by Magistrate Judge Susan M. Bazis. It grants the defendant's motion to extend the deadline for pretrial motions [16], giving an approximate 30-day extension to September 8, 2022. The time between August 9, 2022 and September 8, 2022 is excluded under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) & (B).
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Cite this document
“Order Brenda K. Banks — No. 8:22-cr-00111 (Dkt. 17, D. Neb.).”
Original at archive.org. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/order-brenda-k-banks-no-8-22-cr-00111-dkt-17-d-neb-567ef87d74/
, SHA-256 0d1993a6336a8952bfceeb4cefdbbdb58394e38b0c28a4e72bf857f76c6efb55.Full text
8:22-cr-00111-RFR-SMB Doc # 17 Filed: 08/04/22 Page 1 of 1 - Page ID # 35
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff, 8:22CR111
vs.
ORDER
BRENDA K. BANKS,
Defendant.
This matter is before the court on Defendant's Motion to Extend Deadline to File Pretrial
Motions [16]. For good cause shown, I find that the motion should be granted. Defendant will be
given an approximate 30-day extension. Pretrial Motions shall be filed by September 8, 2022.
IT IS ORDERED:
1. Defendant's Motion to Extend Deadline to File Pretrial Motions [16] is granted.
Pretrial motions shall be filed on or before September 8, 2022.
2. The ends of justice have been served by granting such motion and outweigh the
interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. The additional time arising as a result
of the granting of the motion, i.e., the time between August 9, 2022 and September 8, 2022, shall
be deemed excludable time in any computation of time under the requirement of the Speedy
Trial Act for the reason defendant's counsel required additional time to adequately prepare the
case, taking into consideration due diligence of counsel, and the novelty and complexity of this
case. The failure to grant additional time might result in a miscarriage of justice. 18 U.S.C. §
3161(h)(7)(A) & (B).
Dated this 4th day of August, 2022.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Susan M. Bazis
United States Magistrate Judge
File and source
- File
- 17.pdf
- Size
- 80,500 bytes
- SHA-256
- 0d1993a6336a8952bfceeb4cefdbbdb58394e38b0c28a4e72bf857f76c6efb55
- Our copy
- 17.pdf
- Original
- archive.org