Order Brenda K. Banks — No. 8:22-cr-00111 (Dkt. 13, D. Neb.)
Summary
Order of the U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska in United States v. Brenda K. Banks, case 8:22-cr-00111, Document 13, dated July 7, 2022, signed by Magistrate Judge Susan M. Bazis. It grants the defendant's motion to extend the deadline for pretrial motions [12], giving an approximate 20-day extension to July 26, 2022. The time between July 6, 2022 and July 26, 2022 is excluded under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) & (B).
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Cite this document
“Order Brenda K. Banks — No. 8:22-cr-00111 (Dkt. 13, D. Neb.).”
Original at archive.org. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/order-brenda-k-banks-no-8-22-cr-00111-dkt-13-d-neb-c7a1e784d0/
, SHA-256 c53688352e41c8531fc388e8cd2a67020caf7c08941ae7aee7657901fbe2ff48.Full text
8:22-cr-00111-RFR-SMB Doc # 13 Filed: 07/07/22 Page 1 of 1 - Page ID # 29
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff, 8:22CR111
vs.
ORDER
BRENDA K. BANKS,
Defendant.
This matter is before the court on Defendant's Motion to Extend Deadline to File Pretrial
Motions [12]. For good cause shown, I find that the motion should be granted. Defendant will be
given an approximate 20-day extension. Pretrial Motions shall be filed by July 26, 2022.
IT IS ORDERED:
1. Defendant's Motion to Extend Deadline to File Pretrial Motions [12] is granted.
Pretrial motions shall be filed on or before July 26, 2022.
2. The ends of justice have been served by granting such motion and outweigh the
interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. The additional time arising as a result
of the granting of the motion, i.e., the time between July 6, 2022 and July 26, 2022, shall be
deemed excludable time in any computation of time under the requirement of the Speedy Trial
Act for the reason defendant's counsel required additional time to adequately prepare the case,
taking into consideration due diligence of counsel, and the novelty and complexity of this case.
The failure to grant additional time might result in a miscarriage of justice. 18 U.S.C. §
3161(h)(7)(A) & (B).
Dated this 7th day of July, 2022.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Susan M. Bazis
United States Magistrate Judge
File and source
- File
- 13.pdf
- Size
- 79,822 bytes
- SHA-256
- c53688352e41c8531fc388e8cd2a67020caf7c08941ae7aee7657901fbe2ff48
- Our copy
- 13.pdf
- Original
- archive.org