Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Source documents Order Arvis Manvil Lewis, Jr — No. 8:23-cr-00249 (Dkt. 23, D. Neb.)

Order Arvis Manvil Lewis, Jr — No. 8:23-cr-00249 (Dkt. 23, D. Neb.)

Summary

Order of the U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska in United States v. Arvis Manvil Lewis, Jr., case 8:23-cr-00249, Document 23, dated July 1, 2024, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael D. Nelson. It grants the defendant's unopposed motion to continue the deadline for pretrial motions (Filing No. 22) and sets the new deadline as September 3, 2024. Under 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A), the time until that date is excluded under the Speedy Trial Act.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Cite this document

“Order Arvis Manvil Lewis, Jr — No. 8:23-cr-00249 (Dkt. 23, D. Neb.).” Original at archive.org. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/order-arvis-manvil-lewis-jr-no-8-23-cr-00249-dkt-23-d-neb-fafcea2f2b/, SHA-256 27dfadc5cb83e9cc74eb1e661ee51a53e7b5a3c3d4e0b0f170980124ec829f67.

Full text

   8:23-cr-00249-BCB-MDN Doc # 23 Filed: 07/01/24 Page 1 of 1 - Page ID # 40




                        IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                            FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                       Plaintiff,                                     8:23CR249

        vs.
                                                                       ORDER
ARVIS MANVIL LEWIS, JR.,

                       Defendant.

       This matter is before the Court on Defendant's Unopposed Motion to Continue Deadline
for Filing Pretrial Motions. (Filing No. 22). The motion is unopposed by the government. For
good cause shown, the Court finds the motion should be granted. Accordingly,
       IT IS ORDERED:
       1)     Defendant's Unopposed Motion to Continue Deadline for Filing Pretrial Motions,
              (Filing No. 22), is granted.
       2)     Pretrial motions shall be filed by September 3, 2024.
       3)     In accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A), the Court finds that the ends of
              justice will be served by granting this motion and outweigh the interests of the
              public and the defendant in a speedy trial. Any additional time arising as a result
              of the granting of this motion, that is, the time between today’s date and September
              3, 2024, shall be deemed excludable time in any computation of time under the
              requirement of the Speedy Trial Act. Failure to grant this motion would deny
              counsel the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account
              the exercise of due diligence, and the novelty and complexity of the case. The
              failure to grant this motion might result in a miscarriage of justice. 18 U.S.C. §
              3161(h)(7)(A) & (B). Failing to timely object to this order as provided under this
              court’s local rules will be deemed a waiver of any right to later claim the time
              should not have been excluded under the Speedy Trial Act.

       Dated this 1st day of July, 2024.
                                                    BY THE COURT:

                                                    s/Michael D. Nelson
                                                    United States Magistrate Judge

File and source

File
23.pdf
Size
78,395 bytes
SHA-256
27dfadc5cb83e9cc74eb1e661ee51a53e7b5a3c3d4e0b0f170980124ec829f67
Our copy
23.pdf
Original
archive.org
Back to top