Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Source documents Order Accepting Magistrate Judge's Recommendation — No. 5:23-cr-00599 (Dkt. 45, W.D. Tex.)

Order Accepting Magistrate Judge's Recommendation — No. 5:23-cr-00599 (Dkt. 45, W.D. Tex.)

Summary

Order of the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas by Judge Jason Pulliam, United States v. James Michael Bergeron, case 5:23-cr-00599, Document 45, dated February 6, 2025. Under 28 U.S.C. §636(b) the court had referred the defendant's guilty plea and allocution under Rule 11 to the magistrate judge, with the defendant's consent. Finding the magistrate judge's memorandum and recommendation neither clearly erroneous nor contrary to law, the court accepts it and accepts the guilty plea. The order states that objections may be filed within fourteen (14) days, in which case it will be rescinded.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Cite this document

“Order Accepting Magistrate Judge's Recommendation — No. 5:23-cr-00599 (Dkt. 45, W.D. Tex.).” Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/order-accepting-magistrate-judge-s-recommendation-no-5-23-cr-00599-dkt-db82d79faf/, SHA-256 5b6ba98b139c0841f73db8213a6309f6041c5659515039caea7da0daf01f0d60.

Full text

        Case 5:23-cr-00599-JKP         Document 45        Filed 02/06/25      Page 1 of 2




                         UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                          WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
                             SAN ANTONIO DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA                        §
                                                §
vs.                                             §      NO: SA:23-CR-00599(1)-JKP
                                                §
(1) JAMES MICHAEL BERGERON                      §


       ORDER ACCEPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S RECOMMENDATION

       On this date came on to be considered the Memorandum and Recommendation of the

United States Magistrate Judge, filed in the above-styled and numbered cause. Pursuant to 28

U.S.C. §636(b), this Court referred to the Magistrate Judge the administration of Defendant's

guilty plea and allocution under Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. See United

States v. Dees, 125 F.3d 261 (5th Cir. 1997). Defendant consented to the administration of the

guilty plea and allocution by the Magistrate Judge.

       The Court has reviewed the Memorandum and Recommendation and finds it to be neither

clearly erroneous nor contrary to law. Accordingly,

       IT IS ORDERED that the Memorandum and Recommendation of the United States

Magistrate Judge filed in this cause be and is accepted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1) such

that Defendant's guilty plea is ACCEPTED.

       Any party who desires to object to a Magistrate Judge's findings and recommendations

must serve and file his written objections within fourteen days after being served with a copy of

them. If objections are filed within fourteen (14) days, this order will be rescinded and the Court

may conduct a de novo review. See 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1) ("A judge of the court shall make a de

novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings and
       Case 5:23-cr-00599-JKP        Document 45       Filed 02/06/25   Page 2 of 2




recommendations to which objection is made.").

       IT IS SO ORDERED this 6th day of February, 2025.



                                                 ______________________________
                                                 JASON PULLIAM
                                                 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

File and source

File
45.pdf
Size
112,059 bytes
SHA-256
5b6ba98b139c0841f73db8213a6309f6041c5659515039caea7da0daf01f0d60
Our copy
45.pdf
Original
No public link identified.
Back to top