Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Source documents Opinion — United States v. Mark Randle, No. 20-cr-30060 (Dkt. 14, C.D. Ill.)

Opinion — United States v. Mark Randle, No. 20-cr-30060 (Dkt. 14, C.D. Ill.)

Summary

In this opinion entered April 19, 2021 in the Central District of Illinois, U.S. Magistrate Judge Tom Schanzle-Haskins allows defendant Mark Randle's unopposed motion to review pretrial discovery electronically while in a correctional facility, finding good cause under Local Rule 16.2(D). Access follows the procedures attached to the motion, including rules on electronic storage media, a discovery receipt and viewing log, and detainee laptop issuance procedures. The access depends on Randle's ongoing compliance with the policies agreed by the U.S. Attorney's Office and the Federal Public Defender's Office, and on the correctional institution's ongoing willingness to provide it. Either party may end the access on notice to the other, and the order modifies only Local Rule 16.2(B)(3) and (4).

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Full text

                   3:20-cr-30060-RM-TSH # 14     Page 1 of 2
                                                                                   E-FILED
                                                         Monday, 19 April, 2021 10:17:42 AM
                                                              Clerk, U.S. District Court, ILCD

           IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
 FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS, SPRINGFIELD DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )
                          )
         Plaintiff,       )
                          )
    v.                    )               No. 20-cr-30060
                          )
MARK RANDLE,              )
                          )
         Defendant.       )

                                  OPINION

TOM SCHANZLE-HASKINS, U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE:

      This matter comes before the Court on Defendant Mark Randle’s

Unopposed Motion for Electronic Review of Pretrial Discovery by

Defendant in a Correctional Facility (d/e 12) (Motion). Defendant’s Motion

is ALLOWED. For the reasons set forth in Defendant’s Motion, the Court

finds good cause to allow Defendant to review pretrial discovery

electronically while in a correctional facility. See Local Rule 16.2(D).

      Defendant shall be afforded electronic access to pretrial discovery in

this cause pursuant to the procedures attached to Defendant’s Motion:

Rules Governing Use of Electronic Storage Media to View Legal Materials,

Inmate Discovery Receipt, Electronic Discovery Viewing Log, Discovery

Material Authorization Form, and Detainee Laptop Issuance Procedures.



                                 Page 1 of 2
                    3:20-cr-30060-RM-TSH # 14    Page 2 of 2




      Defendant’s electronic access to pre-trial discovery in this cause is

expressly conditioned on: (1) the ongoing compliance at all times by

Defendant with the policies and procedures previously agreed upon by the

United States Attorney’s Office and the Federal Public Defender’s Office;

and (2) the ongoing willingness of the correctional institution to afford

Defendant electronic access to the pre-trial discovery pursuant to the

policies and procedures previously agreed upon by the United States

Attorney’s Office and the Federal Public Defender’s Office. The parties

further agree that Defendant’s access to discovery can be terminated by

either party upon notice to the other, without cause or leave of Court.

      This order shall modify only the application of Local Rule 16.2(B)(3)

and (4) to this cause. All other provisions of Local Rule 16.2 remain

applicable.

      THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that Defendant Mark Randle’s

Unopposed Motion for Electronic Review of Pretrial Discovery by

Defendant in a Correctional Facility (d/e 12) is ALLOWED.

ENTER: April 19, 2021.

                            s/ Tom Schanzle-Haskins
                            TOM SCHANZLE-HASKINS
                        UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE



                                 Page 2 of 2

File and source

File
gov.uscourts.ilcd.81444.14.0.pdf
Size
81,634 bytes
SHA-256
ca0b5059d0d857c0950d57dbd0105bd048e36dff22aeeaee47bb4b4a53c6b34c
Our copy
gov.uscourts.ilcd.81444.14.0.pdf
Original
No public link identified.
Back to top