Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Opinion — No. 2:22-cr-00852 (Dkt. 72, D.N.J.)Search ⌕

Source documents · Archived capture

Opinion — No. 2:22-cr-00852 (Dkt. 72, D.N.J.)

Summary

An unpublished opinion in United States of America v. John Jhong, Criminal Action No. 22-852 (SDW), in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey, dated and filed June 30, 2025 as Document 72, by District Judge Susan D. Wigenton. It denies Jhong's pro se motions for compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A), finding no extraordinary and compelling reasons, a failure to exhaust for the Fourth Motion, and that the § 3553(a) factors weigh against release. The opinion recounts a December 22, 2022 guilty plea to bank fraud, money laundering and misuse of a social security number, and a November 15, 2023 sentence of thirty-six months with $2,127,390.91 in restitution. It also dismisses Jhong's motion to reduce restitution to $1,887,256.09 over the amount of an EIDL loan, noting that Jhong explicitly agreed to pay $2,127,391.00 in restitution.

Summary drafted by a model from the text of the original file linked on this page and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Archived source document. Preserved source.

View original PDF · 207 KB

Original: archive.org

Record facts

File name72-opinion.pdf
SHA-25610ba44efe702e28b08db2f3893a18f31d1fec9c16c9c5c4886e83ee3e865df8a
Size211,790 bytes
Source sitearchive.org

File and source

File
72-opinion.pdf
Size
211,790 bytes
SHA-256
10ba44efe702e28b08db2f3893a18f31d1fec9c16c9c5c4886e83ee3e865df8a
Our copy
72-opinion.pdf
Original
archive.org
Back to top