Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Opinion — No. 1:23-cv-01876 (Dkt. 32)Search ⌕

Source documents · Archived capture

Opinion — No. 1:23-cv-01876 (Dkt. 32)

Summary

A memorandum opinion by Judge Richard A. Hertling of the United States Court of Federal Claims, filed October 24, 2024 as Document 32 in No. 23-1876C, a suit by 303 restaurant, bar and catering businesses seeking Restaurant Revitalization Fund grants from the United States. The government's motion, ECF 27, filed on October 7, 2024, asked to certify for interlocutory appeal the July 24, 2024 order denying its motion to dismiss and to stay proceedings. The court finds that whether 15 U.S.C. § 9009c is money-mandating and whether the plaintiffs stated a claim are controlling questions of law with substantial ground for difference of opinion, and that an immediate appeal may materially advance the litigation. It grants certification under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(d)(2) and stays further proceedings until briefing in the Court of Appeals is completed.

Summary drafted by a model from the text of the original file linked on this page and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Archived source document. Preserved source.

View original PDF · 179 KB

Original: archive.org

Record facts

File name32-opinion.pdf
SHA-256bb0e9f009ac69bcdd4373947027fed4f3b519dafedc0b020524b0100921a7e81
Size183,312 bytes
Source sitearchive.org

File and source

File
32-opinion.pdf
Size
183,312 bytes
SHA-256
bb0e9f009ac69bcdd4373947027fed4f3b519dafedc0b020524b0100921a7e81
Our copy
32-opinion.pdf
Original
archive.org
Back to top