Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Opinion — No. 1:23-cv-01876 (Dkt. 18)Search ⌕

Source documents · Archived capture

Opinion — No. 1:23-cv-01876 (Dkt. 18)

Summary

A corrected memorandum opinion by Judge Richard A. Hertling of the United States Court of Federal Claims, filed July 24, 2024 as Document 18 in No. 23-1876C, a suit by 303 restaurant, bar and catering businesses against the United States. The plaintiffs claim that 15 U.S.C. § 9009c(c)(1) required the SBA to award Restaurant Revitalization Fund grants in the order applications were received, and that the SBA instead paid them in the order it processed them. The court denies the government's motion to dismiss (ECF 7), holding that the claim is properly brought under the Tucker Act on a money-mandating statute and is not moot. It also holds that the $28.6 billion appropriation does not cap the government's liability for grants allegedly awarded contrary to the statute, so the claims may proceed to the merits.

Summary drafted by a model from the text of the original file linked on this page and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Archived source document. Preserved source.

View original PDF · 406 KB

Original: archive.org

Record facts

File name18-opinion.pdf
SHA-25696780ceb52257b439820fb6a303d3d653b5af8541135fcfbb573249d01c0cd7c
Size416,233 bytes
Source sitearchive.org

File and source

File
18-opinion.pdf
Size
416,233 bytes
SHA-256
96780ceb52257b439820fb6a303d3d653b5af8541135fcfbb573249d01c0cd7c
Our copy
18-opinion.pdf
Original
archive.org
Back to top