Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Source documents Rebuffed on Arbitration, Onfido Calls It Quits in BIPA Lawsuit — Biometric Update (Apr 24, 2023)

Rebuffed on Arbitration, Onfido Calls It Quits in BIPA Lawsuit — Biometric Update (Apr 24, 2023)

Summary

A Biometric Update article by Jim Nash dated Apr 24, 2023 reports that biometric ID verification provider Onfido is settling a suit by plaintiffs who allege it illegally used their personal data. If the judge approves, the classes will split $28.5 million minus the $9.4 million fee their attorneys are due. The two proposed classes accuse Onfido of violating the Biometric Information Privacy Act, an Illinois law, by collecting face biometrics without consent and not explaining its policies for the data; Onfido executives continue to reject the notion that they broke the law. The article says two judges rejected Onfido's attempt two years earlier to move the case to arbitration, and that earlier BIPA settlements cost Veriff $4 million and Jumio $7 million.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Cited in: Husayn Kassai · Onfido / Entrust

Cite this document

“Rebuffed on Arbitration, Onfido Calls It Quits in BIPA Lawsuit — Biometric Update (Apr 24, 2023).” Original at www.biometricupdate.com. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/onfido-28-5m-bipa-settlement-biometric-update-316965af4e/, SHA-256 4bb110cc1120ae564401361b61f05e0655e3e680d7926d9d5c4524a6cebe680c.

Full text

X/Tweet

Link

Comment

Rebuffed on arbitration, Onfido calls it quits in BIPA lawsuit

Apr 24, 2023, 8:51 pm EDT |
Jim Nash

Categories
Biometrics News | Trade Notes

Biometric ID verification provider Onfido is settling a suit brought by plaintiffs alleging that the company had illegally used their personal data. If approved by the judge in the case, the classes will split $28.5 million among themselves minus the $9.4 million fee the attorneys are due.

Two proposed classes accused Onfido of violating the Biometric Information Privacy Act when, according to the plaintiffs, the company collected their face biometrics without getting their consent and did not explain its policies for managing the information.

Onfido executives continue to reject the notion that they broke the law.

BIPA is a landmark law enacted in the U.S. state of Illinois.

The judge does not have to agree to a settlement, although plaintiffs Rohith Amruthur and Fredy Sosa are requesting it.

Onfido two years ago tried to get the case moved to arbitration, where any payout would be much smaller than going to trial. Two judges rejected that request.

Previous BIPA settlements involving biometrics providers have cost Veriff $4 million and Jumio $7 million.

Here is a partial list of BIPA developments.

File and source

File
rebuffed-on-arbitration-onfido-calls-it-quits-in-bipa-lawsuit_3288d128d51cc00e.html
Size
103,286 bytes
SHA-256
4bb110cc1120ae564401361b61f05e0655e3e680d7926d9d5c4524a6cebe680c
Our copy
rebuffed-on-arbitration-onfido-calls-it-quits-in-bipa-lawsuit_3288d128d51cc00e.html
Original
www.biometricupdate.com
Back to top