Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Objection to Thomas Response — No. 1:21-cv-00748 (Dkt. 93)Search ⌕

Source documents · Archived capture

Objection to Thomas Response — No. 1:21-cv-00748 (Dkt. 93)

Summary

Plaintiff's Response to Defaulted Defendant's Supplementation of the Record, filed January 31, 2022 as Document 93 by pro se plaintiff Natasha Athens d/b/a Favorite Things in Athens v. Bank of America and Megan Scholz, Civil Action No. 1:21-cv-00748-SM, in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Hampshire. The filing accuses the defendants, defense counsel and the judges of bank fraud, bias and other misconduct, and cites Facebook posts and articles in Forbes and the Baltimore Sun about Bank of America PPP loan forgiveness. It argues that the plaintiff is entitled to full forgiveness of the PPP loan and to damages for infliction of emotional distress. It states that the plaintiff is filing a motion to strike the defendants' response for failure of service, and it is signed /s/ Natasha Athens.

Summary drafted by a model from the text of the original file linked on this page and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Archived source document. Preserved source.

View original PDF · 1.3 MB

Original: archive.org

Record facts

File name93-objection-to-thomas-response-no-docket-came-up-to-click-by-n.pdf
SHA-256d54d2a631fda8cae39b5cdf800cd593fe03ba32551cd9cc6f97bdaa00c93fc94
Size1,389,394 bytes
Source sitearchive.org

File and source

File
93-objection-to-thomas-response-no-docket-came-up-to-click-by-n.pdf
Size
1,389,394 bytes
SHA-256
d54d2a631fda8cae39b5cdf800cd593fe03ba32551cd9cc6f97bdaa00c93fc94
Our copy
93-objection-to-thomas-response-no-docket-came-up-to-click-by-n.pdf
Original
archive.org
Back to top