Athens v. Bank of America — Response to Defaulted Defendant's Supplementation of the Record (Document 93)

Summary

Plaintiff's Response to Defaulted Defendant's Supplementation of the Record, filed January 31, 2022 as Document 93 by pro se plaintiff Natasha Athens d/b/a Favorite Things in Athens v. Bank of America and Megan Scholz, Civil Action No. 1:21-cv-00748-SM, in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Hampshire. The filing accuses the defendants, defense counsel and the judges of bank fraud, bias and other misconduct, and cites Facebook posts and articles in Forbes and the Baltimore Sun about Bank of America PPP loan forgiveness. It argues that the plaintiff is entitled to full forgiveness of the PPP loan and to damages for infliction of emotional distress. It states that the plaintiff is filing a motion to strike the defendants' response for failure of service, and it is signed /s/ Natasha Athens.

Summary drafted by a model from the text of the original file linked on this page and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Full text

        Case 1:21-cv-00748-SM Document 93 Filed 01/31/22 Page 1 of 8




                        UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

                         DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

                    NATASHA ATHENS d/b/a Favorite Things,

                                     Plaintiff,

                                         v.

                    BANK OF AMERICA and MEGAN SCHOLZ,

                                   Defendants.

                       )Civil Action No. 1:21-cv-00748-SM

                       Ex Party PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE TO

        DEFAULTED DEFENDANT'S SUPPLEMENTATION OF THE RECORD



The case at bar has two currents issues for the court - the crimes contained in
the matter, Bank Fraud, exposing private records
and
Violations to the rules of civil procedure
The BIAS of the court has been overburnened by imbecillic juvenile actions of
the attorney, and of Defendant Megan Scholz.
However, The Judge SOUGHT illicit records, sought privileged records and none
of that would have proved anything if the Plaintiff complied.
The Plaintiff was doing research to obtain the additional cases that NOW are
listed on Facebook right under Bank of America, Feb 16 2021
Multiple small business owners write into the post and state that their loans
TOO were not forgiven
https://www.facebook.com/BankofAmerica/posts/the-ppp-loan-forgiveness-
process-is-getting-an-update-on-feb-16-were-launching-a/3695482043839338/
        Case 1:21-cv-00748-SM Document 93 Filed 01/31/22 Page 2 of 8




Video in case the post is ever deleted, reads the content inside the video of the
posts written by small business owners on Facebook on that particular post, and
other posts contain the same content.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/pmSlTKavHRdT/
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1UoNT2bzDL0qV8bSke_Q4VtWmrYAteP-
k/view
Forbes reports on Bank of America Fraud
https://www.forbes.com/sites/kotlikoff/2021/08/05/bank-of-americas-
malfeasant-treatment-of-small-businesses---brian-moynihan-pick-up-the-damn-
phone-and-call-ember/?sh=126827f85779
Baltimore Sun business owner - loan not forgiven
https://www.baltimoresun.com/opinion/columnists/dan-rodricks/bs-ed-
rodricks-1126-ppp-loan-20211126-lqtporsmhzbtnoelblzubxyzfy-story.html
https://natashanews18.blogspot.com/2021/11/thomas-pappas-lawsuit-stolen-
documents.html
https://natashanews18.blogspot.com/2021/08/bank-of-america-fraud-ppp-
loans-scam.html


The Plaintiff's main case and complaint was always correct, the court's actions
were inexcusable.
1.    During the timing since the case was filed, it was the catalyst for more to
come forward and to state that the bank has acted fraudulently trying to STEAL
back the loans
2.     The SBA has guaranteed the loans to the bank, so if the loans are not
forgiven, the bank is paid anyway. This is the reverse of what should happen,
especially since the banks are doing the robbing and setting up the SBA to come
after the victimized Plaintiff's and small businesses.
In a right world, no one would be illegally pulling loans out of forgiveness so
there would not be a need to pay the banks. In the cases, such as this case and
the other listed, it's unconscionable that the SBA PAY THE THIEF.
        Case 1:21-cv-00748-SM Document 93 Filed 01/31/22 Page 3 of 8




3.    Megan Sholz FALSLEY wrote and told PPP Loan customers that if their
loans were not 100% forgiven, they could go after the SBA for the rest of the
forgiveness, she was LYING, and tricking her own customers. (PS NO one
normal does this due to it being a federal crime)
4.     There is not a single human being that would not endure "stress" onto
their lives with assuming that their lawfully obtained loan was 2.5 weeks of
payroll in 500 days of loss and lockdown and that anyone would ever betray
them.
5.    The Plaintiff's case revolves around that deception and every single
Plaintiff and victim is entitled to damages for the fraud, deception and reversal
of having a loan forgiven, which was to have double dipping employees like
Defendant Megan Scholz scamming her customers.
6.    The Judge here attempted to alter court rules, rules of civil procedure,
and demand protected documents while making his entire time on the bench
and his legacy about going down over a loan for $18,625,00. Many have had to
ask the Plaintiff what is wrong with him? Why?
7.    The reality is that this judge, and no judge can undo this loan, despite
seeking illegal protected material trying to further reverse
8.     The judge put a "strike" on all of the Plaintiff's pleadings, including the
brief he ordered on December 24, 2021, and all of this material "stricken"
without striking the non-party Defendant's pleadings and his failing to serve a
single pleading under court rules shows is bias, collusion, and his partisan stance
on small businesses.
9.    The case at bar is being watched globally, with the additional cases
matching the data, forgiveness theft by Megan Scholz, and the number of small
businesses that had applications timed out to force them to pay back their
loans, or were only offered partial forgiveness.
10. The Bank Of America plot was to make each theft of forgiveness small
enough that most parties would not sue, and just pay the double dipping bank
thieves, their attorneys and give a little chunk to others for aiding in the crimes.
The only problem being that little "thing that got in the way" callled "Social
Media" where victims could find each other so quickly.
         Case 1:21-cv-00748-SM Document 93 Filed 01/31/22 Page 4 of 8




11. Criminals (and bank robbers) are not usually that smart, this is why they
get caught so often. HERE, despite the Plaintiff putting in writing that this case
is being watched, and investigators are glued to the insanity in Thomas Pappas,
and the court and judges, you have a moronic non party - Thomas Pappas,
continue to addict himself to burdening the court to commit felonies with him.
(And Megan Scholz)
12. The court can make an illicit dismissal - it shows complicity and will be
appealed, and its desperation to hold on to this case, despite bias complicity
and the criminal elements are partaking in the crimes contained herein has
nothing to do with the Plaintiff, solely to do with an entitled judge who
privileged himself by obstructing justice and and acting as a party.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/28/144
Judicial Bias
28 U.S. Code § 455 - Disqualification of justice, judge, or magistrate judge
Bank fraud
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1344
13. It's unclear to law abiding citizens why Judges become compromised, evil
and ditch their oaths, but it never has to do w/ the victim using the Constitution
and seeking justice it has to do with their journey of abuse of power.
Judge McAuliffe has targeted and sought out the Plaintiff, while falsely failing to
issue a default ruling on failure to serve.
14. People who have wherewithall and common sense think - why does a
court that is continuing to add self inflicted wounds such as more victims now
showing up every week and filing claims, making blogs and posts that are filed
and linked into the first case on BOA PPP loan forgiveness fraud on their own
customers.
The Plaintiff does not have an answer.
It's painful to watch people that are addicts and so falsely privileged that
comming the above crimes is just a new notch in their belt, when to the world
it's sickening and they seek a jail sentence for all of them to "share a cell".
        Case 1:21-cv-00748-SM Document 93 Filed 01/31/22 Page 5 of 8




15. The other most replied to comment to the Plaintiff is that Thomas Pappas
and Megan are like skunks at a garden party, their worth is not even equal to
that of a 2nd grader, and they are the pawns in the entire crime here, doing this
work so badly that they are caught and they won't relent and even settle this
case so that they are not getting more exposed every day.
16. When there is a single case or complaint, it's possible that there is 0 merit
to it and it's a disgruntled person going after another. The job of a court is to
assure that the pursuing party can prove the allegations
When MULTIPLE newspaper articles from Forbes, Baltimore Sun, and other
places are exposing the exact same circumstances as a case before a judge, the
court MUST act on the facts and evidence, not acting on their personal issue
discriminating against a Constitutional pro-se litigant.
17. The court's bias has failed to ever hold a lawful hearing, on both the
merits of the case, the infliction of emotional distress, and the main case of
100% right to full loan forgivenss.
18. It's comical and tragic that there have been close to 100 pleadings filed
since September 2021, and no hearing, no discovery and 0 questions of Megan
Scholz, who is the pawn on the chess board who has written such reckless
emails and untrue emails that she did herself in.
We have a satire website exposing the sinister corruption and failure to adhere
to the Constitution because that is real for many courts and judges, and it refers
to this case at bar. People who get mad at the truth are simply bothered that
their nefarious actions are able to be brought to the light by honest Plaintiff's
that have a right to due process.
https://babylonbee.com/news/sotomayor-attends-supreme-court-oral-
argument-remotely-to-protect-herself-from-exposure-to-constitution
The ultimate reality is that this judge has tried to make it personal, not nuetral
and using his obligation to his own oath.
19.   Charges have been filed in cases so far w/ MORE TO COME
https://www.mayerbrown.com/en/perspectives-
events/publications/2021/09/charges-against-us-bank-employees-may-
represent-a-new-frontier-in-covidrelief-fraud-cases
         Case 1:21-cv-00748-SM Document 93 Filed 01/31/22 Page 6 of 8




20. What if investigators on this case, are gathering evidence, and usiing the
rulings, the pleadings, and the failures on all parties to adhere to the rule of law
and are compiling a case for everyone involved?
21. What if MORE than this investigator and the Secret Service is watching
the criminal actions of Thomas Pappas and Megan Scholz and have been as I
have stated all along.
22. Everyone (despite the false theory) that excludes you from participating
in the world at large, where felons actually do get arrested, and do get charged,
especially with embezzling stolen funds from CARES act, are actually in trouble
here and just refuse to get it?
23. The compromised parties here failed at a couple of things, and one is to
realize that they have not gotten away with anything and will not.
24. When any party has a bank close their business account for no reason and
not lawfully and denies them access to their business records and bills paid, that
alone is more stress than many can handle and they are entitled to damages, as
is the Plaintiff. A judge, acting as a jury, a Defendant, and a complict party is not
in a position to "judge" the amount of stress, since he's too involved to ever
discover his and her own stress levels for their Compromised Judges Trophy's.
WHEREFORE, The Plaintiff is filng a Motion to Strike this answer, since the
Defendant failed to serve this or any other pleading and cannot use the court
filing system as a substitute for service.
The Plaintiff objects to the lies in his pleading on its face, as a defaulted party he
cannot file a response and for the content response the Plaintiff has COVERED
her damages and suffering and she is still suffering as she is typing this pleading.
Any person that is subjected to 2.5 years of torment over a Federal forgivable
loan, and theft of her tax records, lockout of her bank account, having the SBA
come after her for non=payment of a $1.00 forgiveness loan, when she is due
100% of the loan in forgiveness and she has just listed more than 25 parties and
small businesses with the same exact fraud happening to them, and this court
enabling and covering for and particapating in this crime has proven to any sane
rational thinking law abiding American that they are indeed intitled to Infliction
of Emotional Stress damages, the default and those damages, and the court
        Case 1:21-cv-00748-SM Document 93 Filed 01/31/22 Page 7 of 8




ignoring the rule of law, and damages for the infliction of emotional distress for
not having access to private bank records, and so on.
The court failed itself, and continues to get in its own way, with the reality that
they are headlinging themselves as this case has the details of ALL of the records
of the crimes of these parties contained in it.
And it cannot be "stricken" as a response and not allowing the Plaintiff to file
that which shines the flashlight on the criminals and proves her own case.
The parties are addicts, predators and people that have not amounted to things
this late in their careers.
Defendant Megan in her 40's - embarassing profile she had to hide,
Thomas Pappas, - imbecillic pleadings and failure to use the electronic rules
Judge Johnstone - cannot write a legitimate opinion of a case, despite a month
in her lap, in additional cases of the Plaintiff, she ignored the Constitution 100%,
Judge McAuliffe, - writes Strikes in Revenge, cannot handle a lawful party, a
Constitutional party, uses the rule of law only on himself, thinks he can order
illegal orders and discovery, when his job is to seek why on VP approved a loan,
and one took it out of forgiveness
Despite the same thing happening to more than 25 people in this pleading, this
judge will "make up" his own false narrative and rule against the law, you can
bet on it.
This is the failure of our system to REMOVE and imprison people that betray
their oaths, and the failure of any of them to not be caught until now,
The Plaintiff has followed the law, and is entitled to a forgiven loan as are the
mounting others. ANd WHAT IF we are all talking together and planning to do
something together?
This court has EXPOSED their own nefarious connections to the lowest and most
stupid of criminals that led their bread crumb trail to the judge's chambers.


/s/ Natasha Athens
         Case 1:21-cv-00748-SM Document 93 Filed 01/31/22 Page 8 of 8




Favorite Things
There is no duty to serve a non-party despite court failure to adhere to
rules of civil procedure on electronic filing. Judge McAulifee and Johnstone
failed to hold a single hearing, including on the rules for default and failure to
serve.


January 31, 2022


File and source

File

93-objection-to-thomas-response-no-docket-came-up-to-click-by-n.pdf

Size

1,389,394 bytes

SHA-256

d54d2a631fda8cae39b5cdf800cd593fe03ba32551cd9cc6f97bdaa00c93fc94

Our copy

93-objection-to-thomas-response-no-docket-came-up-to-click-by-n.pdf

Original

archive.org