Source documents · Archived capture
Objection to Thomas Response — No. 1:21-cv-00748 (Dkt. 93)
Summary
Plaintiff's Response to Defaulted Defendant's Supplementation of the Record, filed January 31, 2022 as Document 93 by pro se plaintiff Natasha Athens d/b/a Favorite Things in Athens v. Bank of America and Megan Scholz, Civil Action No. 1:21-cv-00748-SM, in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Hampshire. The filing accuses the defendants, defense counsel and the judges of bank fraud, bias and other misconduct, and cites Facebook posts and articles in Forbes and the Baltimore Sun about Bank of America PPP loan forgiveness. It argues that the plaintiff is entitled to full forgiveness of the PPP loan and to damages for infliction of emotional distress. It states that the plaintiff is filing a motion to strike the defendants' response for failure of service, and it is signed /s/ Natasha Athens.
Summary drafted by a model from the text of the original file linked on this page and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Record facts
| File name | 93-objection-to-thomas-response-no-docket-came-up-to-click-by-n.pdf |
|---|---|
| SHA-256 | d54d2a631fda8cae39b5cdf800cd593fe03ba32551cd9cc6f97bdaa00c93fc94 |
| Size | 1,389,394 bytes |
| Source site | archive.org |
File and source
- File
- 93-objection-to-thomas-response-no-docket-came-up-to-click-by-n.pdf
- Size
- 1,389,394 bytes
- SHA-256
- d54d2a631fda8cae39b5cdf800cd593fe03ba32551cd9cc6f97bdaa00c93fc94
- Original
- archive.org