Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Objection to Presentence Investigation Report — United States v. Lewis Reed (Dkt. 94, E.D. Mo.)Search ⌕

Source documents · Archived capture

Objection to Presentence Investigation Report — United States v. Lewis Reed (Dkt. 94, E.D. Mo.)

Summary

The defendant's objections to the Presentence Investigation Report, filed November 22, 2022 as Doc. 94 in United States v. Lewis Reed, Case No. 4:22-cr-297-2-SRC, in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri, Eastern Division. Reed objects to Paragraphs 71 and 135 of the report, which state that he owes $18,500 in restitution to the Federal Bureau of Investigation for investigative funds spent in the sting operation. The filing argues that under 18 U.S.C. § 3664(f)(1)(A) restitution is due only to victims for their losses, and that the FBI is not a victim, citing United States v. Cook, United States v. Gibbens, United States v. Gall and United States v. Salcedo-Lopez. It states that the parties will agree to a fine equal to the amount of the bribes Reed received. It is signed /s/ by Adam D. Fein.

Summary drafted by a model from the text of the original file linked on this page and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Archived source document. Preserved source.

View original PDF · 498 KB

Original: archive.org

Record facts

File name94-objection-to-presentence-investigation-report-by-lewis-reed.pdf
SHA-256228fb01351d14b5ba54c5c13440a8e6029e21a7a47c94ddbd5c9ef82d14da7cc
Size510,107 bytes
Source sitearchive.org

File and source

File
94-objection-to-presentence-investigation-report-by-lewis-reed.pdf
Size
510,107 bytes
SHA-256
228fb01351d14b5ba54c5c13440a8e6029e21a7a47c94ddbd5c9ef82d14da7cc
Our copy
94-objection-to-presentence-investigation-report-by-lewis-reed.pdf
Original
archive.org
Back to top