Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Objection to 37 Supplemental Motion to Quash Motion To Dismiss Bank — No. 1:21-cv-00748 (Dkt. 40)Search ⌕

Source documents · Archived capture

Objection to 37 Supplemental Motion to Quash Motion To Dismiss Bank — No. 1:21-cv-00748 (Dkt. 40)

Summary

An objection filed November 16, 2021 as Document 40 by defendants Bank of America, N.A. and Megan Scholz to the plaintiff's Motion to Quash Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. #37) in Natasha Athens d/b/a Favorite Things v. Bank of America and Megan Scholz, Civil Action No. 1:21-cv-00748-SM, in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Hampshire. The defendants argue that the plaintiff is mistaken about service, citing Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(b) and the court's Supplemental Rules for Electronic Case Filing. They state that the court granted the plaintiff's motion to participate in electronic filing on September 7, 2021 and that the motion to dismiss (Doc. 33) was served through the ECF system. The objection asks the court to deny the motion to quash and is signed /s/ Thomas J. Pappas.

Summary drafted by a model from the text of the original file linked on this page and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Archived source document. Preserved source.

View original PDF · 29 KB

Original: archive.org

Record facts

File name40-objection-to-37-supplemental-motion-to-quash-motion-to-dismi.pdf
SHA-256352b82b9ac26cedc13fa75e3380f48c6b7adb77361bb98d9e227c8c77596e96c
Size29,330 bytes
Source sitearchive.org

File and source

File
40-objection-to-37-supplemental-motion-to-quash-motion-to-dismi.pdf
Size
29,330 bytes
SHA-256
352b82b9ac26cedc13fa75e3380f48c6b7adb77361bb98d9e227c8c77596e96c
Our copy
40-objection-to-37-supplemental-motion-to-quash-motion-to-dismi.pdf
Original
archive.org
Back to top