Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Objection & Motion to Reconsider — No. 1:21-cv-00748 (Dkt. 79)Search ⌕

Source documents · Archived capture

Objection & Motion to Reconsider — No. 1:21-cv-00748 (Dkt. 79)

Summary

The plaintiff's objection and motion to reconsider the partial dismissal, filed by Natasha Athens in Natasha Athens d/b/a Favorite Things v. Bank of America and Megan Scholz, Civil Action No. 1:21-cv-00748-SM (D.N.H.), on January 22, 2022 as Document 79. The motion accuses the judge of bias, argues that the defendants filed but never served their response, and states that the loan was being forgiven before Scholz pulled it out of forgiveness. It asks the court to require sworn affidavits from Scholz, defense counsel Thomas Pappas and the judges, cites 28 U.S. Code § 144, and seeks reinstatement of the emotional distress claim or recusal. The 7-page filing is signed /s/ by Athens.

Summary drafted by a model from the text of the original file linked on this page and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Archived source document. Preserved source.

View original PDF · 1.5 MB

Original: archive.org

Record facts

File name79-objection-motion-to-reconsider-re-78-order-granting-in-part.pdf
SHA-256eb5553e6a8bcc05cdcfd2841ffd4025a9d2ed1a08f8856739b4268ee972b986f
Size1,557,963 bytes
Source sitearchive.org

File and source

File
79-objection-motion-to-reconsider-re-78-order-granting-in-part.pdf
Size
1,557,963 bytes
SHA-256
eb5553e6a8bcc05cdcfd2841ffd4025a9d2ed1a08f8856739b4268ee972b986f
Our copy
79-objection-motion-to-reconsider-re-78-order-granting-in-part.pdf
Original
archive.org
Back to top