Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Source documents Plaintiffs' Notice of Supplemental Authority — State of West Virginia et al. v. Treasury (N.D. Ala., Doc. 81)

Plaintiffs' Notice of Supplemental Authority — State of West Virginia et al. v. Treasury (N.D. Ala., Doc. 81)

Summary

Plaintiffs' Notice of Supplemental Authority, filed September 27, 2021 as Document 81 in State of West Virginia, et al. v. U.S. Department of the Treasury, Case No. 7:21-cv-00465-LSC, in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama, Western Division. The notice states that the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky issued its decision in Kentucky v. Yellen, Kentucky and Tennessee's Spending Clause challenge to the Tax Mandate, granting the States' motion for summary judgment and holding that the Tax Mandate is unconstitutionally coercive under the Spending Clause. It states that Defendants are now enjoined from seeking enforcement of the Tax Mandate against Tennessee and Kentucky, and attaches the decision. It is signed /s/ Edmund G. LaCour, Jr.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Cite this document

“Plaintiffs' Notice of Supplemental Authority — State of West Virginia et al. v. Treasury (N.D. Ala., Doc. 81).” Original at storage.courtlistener.com. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/notice-other-state-of-west-virginia-et-al-v-u-s-department-of-the-trea-2f10e41385/, SHA-256 ddc461601ec197673313ee6aaf34bbc2414e33cb3509c7108e7a2a35f165b155.

Full text

        Case 7:21-cv-00465-LSC Document 81 Filed 09/27/21 Page 1 of 6                    FILED
                                                                                2021 Sep-27 PM 04:42
                                                                                U.S. DISTRICT COURT
                                                                                    N.D. OF ALABAMA


                IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
               FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
                         WESTERN DIVISION


STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA, et al.,              Case No. 7:21-cv-00465-LSC

                   Plaintiffs,

          v.

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE
TREASURY, et al.,

                   Defendants.


        PLAINTIFFS’ NOTICE OF SUPPLEMENTAL AUTHORITY

       On Friday, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of

Kentucky issued its decision in Kentucky and Tennessee’s Spending Clause

challenge to the Tax Mandate. Kentucky v. Yellen, No. 3:21-cv-000-17 (E.D. Ky.

Sep. 24, 2021).

      In the opinion, the court granted the States’ motion for summary judgment,

holding that the Tax Mandate is unconstitutionally coercive under the Spending

Clause and that “the coercion presented in the ARPA is exactly the kind of intrusion

on state sovereignty that the Constitution prohibits.” Id. at 11. In so holding, the

court cited both the “sheer size of the federal government’s offering” and the

“economic devastation the pandemic has brought.” Id. at 9. Considering all fifty

States and the District of Columbia, the court recognized that ARPA funds represent
                                         1
         Case 7:21-cv-00465-LSC Document 81 Filed 09/27/21 Page 2 of 6




“roughly twenty percent of the annual state tax collections brought in by state

governments” and held that “‘refusing to accede to the conditions set out in the [law]

is not a realistic option.’” Id. at 8 (quoting Nat’l Fed'n of Indep. Bus. v. Sebelius, 567

U.S. 519, 681 (2012) (Scalia, J., dissenting)). The court specifically rejected

Defendants’ argument that NFIB’s coercion analysis applied only to conditions

affecting the receipt of pre-existing funds, slip. op. at 7 n.3, the same argument

Defendants rely on here. See Doc. 76 at ECF 37.

      Finally, the court held that a permanent injunction was appropriate because

there is “no cognizable interest of the federal government in enforcing the Tax

Mandate” and because “the States’ ability to set their taxing policy as a co-sovereign

enhances, rather than threatens, individual liberty.” Slip op. at 14. Defendants are

now enjoined from seeking enforcement of the Tax Mandate against Tennessee and

Kentucky.

      The court’s decision is attached.

DATED: September 27, 2021                 Respectfully submitted,




                                            2
        Case 7:21-cv-00465-LSC Document 81 Filed 09/27/21 Page 3 of 6




/s/ Edmund G. LaCour, Jr.               /s/ Bryan M. Taylor
STEVE MARSHALL                          Bryan M. Taylor
  Alabama Attorney General              Bachus Brom & Taylor LLC
Edmund G. LaCour, Jr.                   300 Vestavia Parkway, Suite 3700
  Alabama Solicitor General             Birmingham, AL 35216
James W. Davis                          Tel: (334) 595-9650
A. Reid Harris                          btaylor@bachusbrom.com
  Assistant Attorneys General
Office of the Alabama                   /s/ Nicholas Bronni
Attorney General                        LESLIE RUTLEDGE
501 Washington Ave.                       Arkansas Attorney General
P.O. Box 300152                         Nicholas J. Bronni (pro hac vice)
Montgomery, AL 36130                      Arkansas Solicitor General
Tel: (334) 353-2196                     Vincent M. Wagner (pro hac vice)
edmund.lacour@alabamaAg.gov               Deputy Solicitor General
jim.davis@AlabamaAG.gov                 Dylan L. Jacobs (pro hac vice)
reid.harris@AlabamaAG.gov                 Assistant Solicitor General
Counsel for State of Alabama            Office of the Arkansas
                                        Attorney General
/s/ Lindsay S. See                      323 Center Street, Suite 200
PATRICK MORRISEY                        Little Rock, Arkansas 72201
  West Virginia Attorney General        Tel: (501) 682-6302
Lindsay S. See (pro hac vice)           nicholas.bronni@arkansasag.gov
  West Virginia Solicitor General       Counsel for State of Arkansas
David C. Tryon (pro hac vice)
  Special Assistant to the              /s/ John M. Ptacin
   Attorney General                     TREG R. TAYLOR
  (Admitted in Ohio; practicing           Attorney General of Alaska
   under supervision of West Virginia   John M. Ptacin (pro hac vice)
   attorneys)                             Chief Assistant Attorney General
Jessica A. Lee (pro hac vice)           Alaska Department of Law
  Assistant Solicitor General           1031 West Fourth Avenue, Suite 200
Office of the West Virginia             Anchorage, Alaska 99501
Attorney General                        Tel: (907) 269-5100
1900 Kanawha Blvd. East                 Facsimile: (907) 276-3697
Building 1, Room E-26                   John.ptacin@alaska.gov
Charleston, WV 25305                    Counsel for State of Alaska
Tel: (304) 558-2021
Lindsay.S.See@wvago.gov
Counsel for State of West Virginia
                                         3
       Case 7:21-cv-00465-LSC Document 81 Filed 09/27/21 Page 4 of 6




/s/ Jason Hilborn                   /s/ David M.S. Dewhirst
ASHLEY MOODY                        AUSTIN KNUDSEN
  Florida Attorney General            Attorney General of Montana
Jason H. Hilborn (pro hac vice)     David M.S. Dewhirst (pro hac vice)
  Assistant Solicitor General         Solicitor General
Office of the Florida               Office of the Attorney General
Attorney General                    215 North Sanders
Office of the Attorney General      P.O. Box 201401
State of Florida                    Helena, MT 59620-1401
PL-01 The Capitol                   Tel: (406) 444-4145
Tallahassee, FL 32399               David.Dewhirst@mt.gov
Tel: (850) 414-3300                 Counsel for the State of Montana
Jason.Hilborn@myfloridalegal.com
Counsel for State of Florida        /s/ Anthony J. Galdieri
/s/ Jeffrey S. Thompson             Anthony J. Galdieri
THOMAS J. MILLER                    Senior Assistant Attorney General, Civil
 Attorney General of Iowa           Bureau
Jeffrey S. Thompson*                New Hampshire Department of Justice
  Solicitor General                 33 Capitol Street
1305 East Walnut Street             Concord, NH 03301
Des Moines, IA 50319                Tel: (603) 271-1214
Tel: 515-281-5164                   Anthony.J.Galdieri@doj.nh.gov
jeffrey.thompson@ag.iowa.gov        Counsel for the State of
Counsel for State of Iowa           New Hampshire

/s/ Dwight R. Carswell              /s/ Mithun Mansinghani
DEREK SCHMIDT                       JOHN M. O’CONNOR
  Kansas Attorney General             Oklahoma Attorney General
Dwight R. Carswell (pro hac vice)   Mithun Mansinghani (pro hac vice)
  Assistant Solicitor General         Solicitor General
Office of the Kansas                Oklahoma Office Of The
Attorney General                    Attorney General
120 SW 10th Ave., 3rd Floor         313 NE Twenty-First St.
Topeka, Kansas 66612                Oklahoma City, OK 73105
Tel: (785) 368-8410                 Tel: (405) 521-3921
dwight.carswell@ag.ks.gov           mithun.mansinghani@oag.ok.gov
Counsel for State of Kansas         Counsel for the State of Oklahoma
                                     4
       Case 7:21-cv-00465-LSC Document 81 Filed 09/27/21 Page 5 of 6




/s/ J. Emory Smith, Jr.               /s/ Melissa A. Holyoak
ALAN WILSON                           SEAN REYES
  South Carolina Attorney General       Utah Attorney General
J. Emory Smith, Jr. (pro hac vice)    Melissa A. Holyoak (pro hac vice)
  Deputy Solicitor General              Utah Solicitor General
Office of the South Carolina          Office of the Utah Attorney General
Attorney General                      160 E. 300 S., 5th Floor
Post Office Box 11549                 Salt Lake City, UT 84114
Columbia, SC 29211                    Tel: (801) 366-0260
Tel: (803) 734-3680                   Counsel for State of Utah
esmith@scag.gov
Counsel for State of South Carolina

/s/ Jeffery J. Tronvold
JASON RAVNSBORG
  South Dakota Attorney General
Jeffery J. Tronvold (pro hac vice)
  Deputy Attorney General
1302 East Highway 14, Suite 1
Pierre, South Dakota 57501-8501
Tel: (605) 773-3215
Jeffery.tronvold@state.sd.us
Counsel for State of South Dakota




                                       5
       Case 7:21-cv-00465-LSC Document 81 Filed 09/27/21 Page 6 of 6




                        CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

      I hereby certify that on September 27, 2021, I filed with the Court and served

on all counsel through the CM/ECF system the foregoing document.

                                      /s Edmund G. LaCour Jr.
                                      Counsel for the State of Alabama




                                         6


File and source

File
81-notice-other.pdf
Size
401,528 bytes
SHA-256
ddc461601ec197673313ee6aaf34bbc2414e33cb3509c7108e7a2a35f165b155
Our copy
81-notice-other.pdf
Original
storage.courtlistener.com
Back to top