Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Source documents Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording, State of Michigan et al. v. DeVos, No. 3:20-cv-04478 (N.D. Cal.), Doc. 38-1 (July 22, 2020)

Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording, State of Michigan et al. v. DeVos, No. 3:20-cv-04478 (N.D. Cal.), Doc. 38-1 (July 22, 2020)

Summary

A Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording filed July 22, 2020 as Document 38-1 in State of Michigan et al. v. DeVos, Case No. 3:20-cv-04478-JD, in the United States District Court, Northern District of California. The notice states that the case is assigned to a judge who participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project, referring to General Order 65, and that the parties' consent is required before any proceedings may be recorded. It states that consent will be presumed if a recording is requested unless a party submits an Objection to Request for Video Recording form. The notice is from Susan Y. Soong, Clerk of Court.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Cite this document

“Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording, State of Michigan et al. v. DeVos, No. 3:20-cv-04478 (N.D. Cal.), Doc. 38-1 (July 22, 2020).” Original at storage.courtlistener.com. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/notice-of-eligibility-for-video-recording-state-of-michigan-et-al-v-de-62c63be93b/, SHA-256 60a31cfff3fd9f6475256c85cb29b712b20cfac4e31b66573a4760f352204ca2.

Full text

         Case 3:20-cv-04478-JD Document 38-1 Filed 07/22/20 Page 1 of 1




                             UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

                           NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


                 NOTICE OF ELIGIBILITY FOR VIDEO RECORDING



       This case is assigned to a judge who participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot

Project. See General Order 65 and cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. The parties’ consent is required

before any proceedings in this case may be recorded. If a party, the presiding judge, or a

member of the media requests that a proceeding be recorded, consent of the parties will be

presumed unless a party submits an Objection to Request for Video Recording form as directed

by the Cameras in the Courtroom Procedures.



       Parties objecting to video recording are asked, for research purposes, to communicate to

the Court the reasons for declining to participate. If you decline to participate, you should

candidly convey the reasons for your decision. Whether you agree to participate or decline to

participate will have no effect on your case whatsoever.




                                                      Susan Y. Soong, Clerk of Court

File and source

File
38-att1-notice-of-eligibility-for-video-recording.pdf
Size
37,215 bytes
SHA-256
60a31cfff3fd9f6475256c85cb29b712b20cfac4e31b66573a4760f352204ca2
Our copy
38-att1-notice-of-eligibility-for-video-recording.pdf
Original
storage.courtlistener.com
Back to top