Athens v. Bank of America — Ex-Party Notice of Interlocutory Appeal on Denial of Recusal (Document 54)

Summary

A notice of interlocutory appeal filed November 23, 2021 as Document 54 by plaintiff Natasha Athens, doing business as Favorite Things, in Athens v. Bank of America et al, Case 1:21-cv-00748-SM, captioned Concord, NH. It appeals the denial of her emergency motion to recuse the magistrate judge and Judge McAuliffe. The plaintiff contends that the judges acted with bias toward the defendants and asks that the forgivable loan be restored from $1.00 to the loaned amount of $18,625.00. It states that the plaintiff seeks an impartial judge, loan forgiveness, compensation by default and compensation for records the notice says were stolen and later sealed. It is signed /s/ Natasha Athens and states that no service is due on a non-party.

Summary drafted by a model from the text of the original file linked on this page and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Full text

        Case 1:21-cv-00748-SM Document 54 Filed 11/23/21 Page 1 of 5




                                   Concord, NH
District of Merrimack NH                           Docket # CV-00748-SM

                                Favorite Things
                                     a DBA
                                Natasha Athens
                                       v.
                              Bank of America et al
                                 Megan Scholz
                                  Defendants


PLAINTIFF'S EX-PARTY NOTICE OF INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL ON DENIAL OF
RECUSAL OF PARTISAN JUDGES

Now comes the Plaintiff upon the "denial" of an Emergency Recusal of Magistrate
Judge and Judge McAuliffe which is par for the Judicial course.

The PLOT was to allow an unserved case involving bank fraud, non-forgiveness of
an approved loan, and to conspire with the bank, the law firm, and 2 judges to
engage together in theft of the rule of law and the rights of the Plaintiff.

Despite 2 judges witnessing theft of records and having to seal them as a matter
of federal law, and punishment by fines and jail, this court and these 2 judges
intended to hold the Plaintiff "hostage" to their bias, and to continue on with a
Motion to Dismiss from a Non-party who they must have serious ties to. Serious
ties.

No where under sharia law, or the Constitution is there enough leeway to create
this massive bias used as a position to defy FDIC banking protection, Federal
regulations, the allowances in the CARES act that loaned tax money to business
owners to be forgiven.

This court, these 2 judges are complicit and expected the Plaintiff to succumb to
the 3rd round of illicit dismissals they had prepped up since the case was filed.
Their method of operation was to use the "court" as a venue to aid and abet in
         Case 1:21-cv-00748-SM Document 54 Filed 11/23/21 Page 2 of 5




the crimes of Bank of America, and VP Megan Scholz, and target the Plaintiff for
her right to forgiveness.

Both PARTISAN judges depended on their "benches" to be comfortably able to
carry out and endorse the crimes of the Defendants, and simply "deny" any rights
at all to the Plaintiff.

The saddest thing is that there is no re-defining of the rules of filng and service
and Magistrate Judge was so partisan that she failed to address it at the onset and
let the legal terms be utilizied and still intentionally after that ruling of telling the
Defendant that he had to take a keystroke step and send a 2 second email to
serve any Plaintiffl. And then still continue to rule against the law, rule against
the FDIC, CARES act, rule against fixing a forgivable loan from $1.00 to the loaned
amount of $18,625.00 which was approved by both the bank, The Defendant and
the SBA.

The court was joyous at the thought of putting the Plaintiff on the hook for
forgivable money, they likely laughed about it and are so partisan that they took
pleasure (and still are) that the forgivable loan has not been forgiven. There is a
level of dysfunction that is inexplicable to normal people. However, partisan
judges ENJOY their own addiction to violations to people they detest and their
bias is that they actually await victims and operate like praying mantis's that catch
victims in their claws.

The Plaintiff IS Not a doctor, does not possess any medical degree, and cannot
explain the sick thoughts of partisan people, they defy the normal mind.

Courts are NOT a location for this type of enemy, and they are supposed to
provide a forum where truth and facts prove innocence or guilt. Instead, the
guilty are coddled by the corrupt, and the innocent are trapped without any exit
ramp.

The ADDICTION of all parties to their abuse of power, starting from Defendant
Megan Scholz, who has destroyed her own right to practice law over her
participation in the most stupid bank crime in history. The Defendant's plot was
thwarted by the Plaintiff and even though they did force a few businesses to pay
back loaned loan money that was forgivable, the rest stood ground and the
         Case 1:21-cv-00748-SM Document 54 Filed 11/23/21 Page 3 of 5




Plaintiff aided in those that fought back. So the 2 judges in this court as well as
the entire New Hampshire Federal court all engaged in HELPING carry out loan
theft, loan forgiveness theft and so on.

In PAPERWORK of denying motions to rescuse even after stolen tax records and
privileged documents were sealed, this court continues to display the bias, and
inability to use the judical power to ever act under their oaths and the
Constitution. Their partisan agenda is on display for the world and they deny
motions on Plaintiff's case after case and force cases onto appeal and have for
decades, far beyond the Plaintiff's case.

Despite SHOWING their partisan agenda, and aiding in the crime of bank robbery,
aiding in stealing money from businesses that EVERY Plaintiff has a right to have
forgiven, the judges in this court RULED JUST NOW AGAINST THE CARES ACT,
AGAINST THE SBA FORGIVENESS, AGAINST THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT AIDING
IN BUSINESSES DURING A PANDEMIC, and AGAINST THE FDIC WHICH DOES NOT
ALLOW FOR ANY BANK TO CLOSE BUSINESS ACCOUNTS, NOR CAN THEY STEAL
FROM THEIR CUSTOMERS VIA LOAN FRAUD, and the contempt for the Plaintiff is
blatantly clear from this ruling after additional crimes.

WHEREFORE, the Plaintiff gets to appeal and gets to receive an impartial judge,
and gets to have her loan forgiven, and gets to be compensated by default, and
gets to be compensated for criminally stolen records that were sealed by these
partisan judges under the law, and she gets to be released from this toxic trap
and the claws of compromised "preying mantis" judges that live to target the
brave and the lawful.

There is no case that this court can have jurisiction over the Plaintiff, they have
proven their bias over and over, and their being incapable of knowing they are
bias, and recusing themselves because of that, and allowing for her to obtain
justice is now exposed. And they won't be allowed to rule or hear any cases
involving her, they will be appealed. The fact that they intended to defy the law,
defy banking law, defy compensation to victims of stolen records, defy rules for
filing and serving, defy default rulings, defy forgiveness of loans to businesses,
even the ones they eat in in New Hampshire their own state, defy forgivness for
the places they shop, and so on, is frightening, and it's sad. One has to ask how
         Case 1:21-cv-00748-SM Document 54 Filed 11/23/21 Page 4 of 5




they got that way? What is in their wallets? What is their connection to the
Defendants?

The most targeted are the most lawful, and the people that believe there is a
justice system when there is not. Rumors fly about how we got to this place and
time in history, and what money influenced getting us to this dark place. The
truth is that it was built over decades while everyone tried to work and survive
and take care of their families.

Compromised judges like Magistrate Judge Johnstone and Judge McAuliffe should
scare everyone that they rule without any law attached, and fail all citizens that
are targeted and abused in ways that they seek civil remedy.

Had the Plaintiff carried out her platform in running for Governor of NH, Judges
would be the first thing she would have addressed, and removed the bad ones,
for destroying state liberties and enforcing actual laws to protect citizens, another
reason they target her.

The only thing anyone can do in a broken system is unbreak it, not cave and
enable Judicical misconduct to the degree we see here. The prayer of the Plaintiff
was only to get her loan forgiven, and compensation for the stress that it cost her
as well as time for filing the case and losing that time from her business. This
court was obligated to see that this occurred, and instead we saw a display of
partisan rulings, ignorance of all laws and every right of the Plaintiff and a bias so
blatant that it brought both judges into the crimes of covering for the crimes of
the attorney.

NOTICE OF INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL SERVED UPON THE COURT THIS DAY
NOVEMBER 23 2021

AS WELL AS NOTICE TO THE CLERK TO ASSEMBLE THE RECORD

THERE IS NO SERVICE DUE TO A NON-PARTY

/s/ Natasha Athens
Case 1:21-cv-00748-SM Document 54 Filed 11/23/21 Page 5 of 5


File and source

File

54-notice-of-appeal-on-denial-of-recusal-by-natasha-athens-no-f.pdf

Size

1,560,192 bytes

SHA-256

d2e19189d0b8f5a7ffa9aba3b37a13612eeef8edac8cd2fcab962341b67ede07

Our copy

54-notice-of-appeal-on-denial-of-recusal-by-natasha-athens-no-f.pdf

Original

archive.org