Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Notice of Supplemental Authority — DV Diamond Club (E.D. Mich.)Search ⌕

Source documents · Archived capture

Notice of Supplemental Authority — DV Diamond Club (E.D. Mich.)

Summary

Defendants' Notice of Supplemental Authority in DV Diamond Club of Flint, LLC v. U.S. Small Business Administration, No. 4:20-cv-10899-MFL-DRG, in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, filed May 1, 2020 as ECF No. 35. At the court's invitation during oral argument on ECF No. 12, the defendants cite Gen. Media Commc'ns, Inc. v. Cohen, 131 F.3d 273 (2d Cir. 1997) and PMG Intern. Div. L.L.C. v. Rumsfeld, 303 F.3d 1163 (9th Cir. 2002). The notice states that General Media rejected claims that the Military Honor and Decency Act was viewpoint-based and vague, and that PMG rejected a claim of viewpoint discrimination against the Act. It argues General Media also supports finding section 120.110(p) not unconstitutionally vague. A footnote says the SBA construes "prurient" in 13 C.F.R. § 120.110(p) to mean arousing lascivious or lustful desire.

Summary drafted by a model from the text of the original file linked on this page and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Archived source document. Preserved source.

View original PDF · 50 KB

Original: archive.org

Record facts

File name35-notice-by-all-defendants-of-supplement-authority.pdf
SHA-256e563a858c0768f3293e849db8502230581326d185a023ccd700971424c4f334b
Size51,305 bytes
Source sitearchive.org

File and source

File
35-notice-by-all-defendants-of-supplement-authority.pdf
Size
51,305 bytes
SHA-256
e563a858c0768f3293e849db8502230581326d185a023ccd700971424c4f334b
Our copy
35-notice-by-all-defendants-of-supplement-authority.pdf
Original
archive.org
Back to top