Motion to Intervene, State of Ohio v. Yellen, No. 1:21-cv-00181 (S.D. Ohio), Doc. 7 (March 24, 2021)

Summary

Emergency Motions to Intervene; for Issuance of a Protective Order with Witness Protection; and for Temporary Injunction, Sua Sponte, filed 03/24/21 in State of Ohio, et al. v. Yellen, et al., Case #: 1:21-cv-00181-DRC. The filer, Stephen P. Wallace, appears as "USA, ex rel; Stephen P. Wallace, Private Attorney General & Relator, and All US Taxpayers similarly situated." The motion states that the filer previously filed a case in Seattle (Case #: 16-cv-01371) alleging "Misappropriation of US Taxpayer Funds" of the "2009 RECOVERY ACT, et al." It asks the Court to grant a protective order and witness protection sua sponte and instanter. Attached pages include a Wikipedia printout on the term private attorney general.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Full text

Text recognized from a scanned document; may contain errors.

Case: 1:21-cv-00181-DRC Doc #: 7 Filed: 03/24/21 Page: 1 of 15 PAGEID #: 59 A

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FILED
RICHARD W. NAGEL

FOR SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO °~! "OF &-URF

OHIO, et al., Plaintiffs CEST BY COLMA

vs. Case #: 1:21-cv-00181-DRC
YELLEN, et al. Defendants

EMERGENCY MOTIONS TO INTERVENE; FOR ISSUANCE OF A PROTECTIVE ORDER
WITH WITNESS PROTECTION; & FOR TEMPORARY INJUNCTION, SUA SPONTE

1 That Intervenor appears as “USA, ex rel; Stephen P. Wallace, Private Attorney
General & Relator, and All US Taxpayers similarly situated”; that Intervenor
previously Filed, and [USA, ex rel;] Granted via [E-File] in Seattle [WD WA] USDC in
(Case #: 16-cv-01371), for alleged “Misappropriation of US Taxpayer Funds”, of the
“2009 RECOVERY ACT, et al.”, @ [S1Trillion] INFRASTRUCTURE FUNDS FOR SHOVEL-
READY JOBS”; (see COMPLAINT with Exhibits, & Process served upon Defendants, on
PACER), thus Verifying “YELLEN, et al., DEFENDANTS”, shall be Subject to FORENSIC
AUDITS, by [BDO USA LEC] of where the [1st $1Trillion] from the so called “2009
RECOVERY ACT”, has been Misappropriated to, considering the recent [$1.9 Trillion]
has met the same FATE, and yesterday’s sham [$3 Trillion] PENDING, would bring
“USA, ex rel; and all similarly situated” into “Voluntary Bankruptcy, Under Color of
Law”; (see Chronology enclosed)

2 That Intervenor renewed the alleged “Federal Actors’ Charges” AGAIN in DC USDC
[Case #: 1:19-cv-02168], for “Breach of DUTY to Account’, after Judicial Notice &
Actual Knowledge, and Again was Subverted Filing the USSC WRIT of MANDEMUS, for
the [3 TIME] by the USSC deputy clerk in collusion with Defendants; (see PACER)

3 That Intervenor alleges the “Same Presidential Régime” are back in Power to
perpetrate their [2° & 3 Predicate Acts], acting with Impunity and perceived
Immunity from Accountability, which “Only this Court has Subject Matter
Jurisdiction”, to Issue ALL RELIEF noted Above, sua sponte & instanter;
Case: 1:21-cv-00181-DRC Doc #: 7 Filed: 03/24/21 Page: 2 of 15 PAGEID #: 60

4 That the Allegations have been Clearly stated to AG YOST & IG MEYER, that these
Communications have been LEAKED, which Intervenor has been continuously, with
Capital Malice & Forethought, been “Stalked for Abduction & Termination’:

5 That Intervenor Relocated to COLUMBUS last Sunday am, and will take-up his
Residency, thus asserting Hon. Douglas Cole has JURISDICTION, In an Abundance of
Caution; For Good Cause Shown; In the Interest of Justice; and for NATIONAL
SECURITY of our REPUBLIC, to Grant Intervenor the instant PROTECTIVE ORDER and
WITNESS PROTECTION, sua sponte & instanter.

Cc: AG YOST & IG MEYER &
“YELLEN Counsel of RECORD”
Urgently & Respectfully submitted,

Stephen P. Wallace, INTERVENOR
SS A. 175 East Town Street #310
Columbus, OH. 43215
(331) 220-9734
AFFIDAVIT Cspa ulwa//a ct ey shoo Com,

| swear/affirm the aforementioned is true under penalty of perjury

Stateof OTD

RP
Stephen P. Wallace appeared this B day of March, 2021, and signed this Affidavit

Notary Public
Case: 1:21-cv-00181-DRC Doc #: 7 Filed: 03/24/21 Page: 3 of 15 PAGEID #: 61

Private attorney general - Wikipedia, the free enc yelopedia http:/‘en, wikipedia.org, wiki Private. attorney general

lof?

Private attorney general

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Private attorney general is an informal term usually used today in the United States to refer to a private

party who brings a lawsuit considered to be in the public interest, ie.. benefiting the general public and not

just the plaintiff.'"! The person considered “private attorney general” is entitled to recover attorney's feesif >
he or she prevails. The rationale behind this principle is to provide extra incentive to private citizens to

pursue suits that may be of benefit to society at large.

| Contents

|

| « 1 Examples of application

' @ 2 Civil Rights Attorney's Fees Award Act
« 3 Other uses
« 4 References
® 5 See also

Examples of application

Many civil rights statutes rely on private attomeys general for their enforcement. In Newman vy. Piggie
Park Enterprises {1 one of the earliest cases construing the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the United States
Supreme Court ruled that "A public accommodations suit is thus private in form only. When a plaintiff
brings an action . . . he cannot recover damages. [f he obtains an injunction, he does so not for himselt’
alone but also as a ‘private atlomey general,' vindicating a policy that Congress considered of the highest
Pricrity." The United States Congress has also passed laws with "private attorney general” provisions that
provide for the enforcement of laws prohibiting employment discrimination, police brutality, and water
pollution, Under the Clean Water Act, for example, “any citizen" may bring suit against an individual or a

company that is a source of water pollution, !“#etton needed]

Another example of the “private attorney general” provisions is the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt X
Organizations Act (RICO). RICO allows average citizens (private attorneys general) to sue those

organizations that commit mail and wire fraud as part of their criminal enterprise, [tation needed) 7, date

there are over 60 federal statutes!“H##tion needed] 4 encourage private enforcement by allowing prevailing
plaintiffs to collect attorney's fees.

Attomeys who function as a private attorney general do so without compensation, The statutes permitting a
plaintiff to recover attomeys’ fees have been held not to apply when the plaintiff is an attorney.

Civil Rights Attorney's Fees Award Act

The U.S. Congress codified the private attorney general principle into law with the enactment of Civil
Rights Attorney's Fees Award Act of £976, 42 US.C. § 1988 (http://www. law.comell.edu/uscode
/42/1988. html). The Senate Report on this statute stated that The Senate Committee on the Judiciary

8729/2013 11:08 AM
Case: 1:21-cv-00181-DRC Doc #: 7 Filed: 03/24/21 Page: 4 of 15 PAGEID #: 62

Pro Se Law

HIAINES v. KERNER, ET AL. 404 U.S. 519, 92 5. Ct. 504, 30 L. Ed. 2d 652. Whatever may be the limits
on the scope of inquiry of courts into the internal administration of prisons, allegations such as those
asserted by petitioner, however inartfully pleaded, are sufficient to call for the opportunity to offer
supporting evidence. We cannot say with assurance that under the allegations of the pro se complaint,
which we hold to less stringent standards than formal pleadings drafted by lawyers, it appears "beyond
doubt that the plaintiff can prove no set of facts in support of his claim which would entitle him to relief."
Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41, 45-46 (1957). See Dioguardi v. Durning, 139 F.2d 774 (CA2 1944).

ESTELLE, CORRECTIONS DIRECTOR, ET AL. v. GAMBLE 29 U.S. 97, 97 5. Ct. 285, 50 L. Ed. 2d
251. We now consider whether respondent's complaint states a cognizable 1983 claim. The handwritten pro
se document is to be liberally construed. As the Court unanimously held in Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519
(1972), a pro sé complaint, "however inartfully pleaded," must be held to "less stringent standards than
formal pleadings drafted by lawyers" and can only be dismissed for failure to state a claim if it appears
"beyond doubt that the plaintiff can prove no set of facts in support of his claim which would entitle him to
relief." Id., at 520-521, quoting Conley v,. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41, 45-46 (1957).

WILLIAM MCNEIL, PETITIONER v. UNITED STATES 113 S. Ct. 1980, 124 L. Ed. 2d 21, 61

U.S.L.W. 4468. Moreover, given the clarity of the statutory text, it is certainly not a "trap for the unwary." It

is no doubt true that there are cases in which a litigant proceeding without counsel may make a fatal

procedural error, but the risk that a lawyer will be unable to understand the exhaustion requirement is

virtually nonexistent. Our rules of procedure are based on the assumption that litigation is normally

conducted by lawyers. While we have insisted that the pleadings prepared by prisoners who do not have y
access to counsel be liberally construed, see Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519 (1972); Estelle v. Gamble, 429
U.S. 97, 106 (1976), and have held that some procedural rules must give way because of the unique
circumstance of incarceration, see Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266 (1988) (pro se prisoner's notice of appeal
deemed filed at time of deliveryto prison authorities), we have never suggested that procedural rules in
ordinary civil litigation should be interpreted so as te excuse mistakes by those who proceed without
counsel, As we have noted before, "in the long run, experience teaches that strict adherence to the
procedural requirements specified by the legislature is the best guarantee of evenhanded administration of

the law." Mohasco Corp. v. Silver, 447 U.S. 807, 826 (1980).

BALDWIN COUNTY WELCOME CENTER v. BROWN 466 U.S. 147, 104 S. Ct. 1723, 80 L. Ed. 2d
196, 52 U.S.L.W. 3751. Rule 8(f) provides that " pleadings shall be so construed as to do substantial
justice.” We frequently have stated that pro se pleadings are to be given a liberal construction.

HUGHES v. ROWE ETAL. 449 U.S. 5, 1015S. Ct. 173, 66 L. Ed. 2d 163, 49 U.S.L.W. 3346. Petitioner's
complaint, like most prisoner complaints filed in the Northern District of Illinois, was not prepared by w
counsel. It is settled law that the allegations of such a complaint, “however inartfully pleaded” are held "to

less stringent standards than formal pleadings drafted by lawyers, see Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520
(1972). See also Maclin v. Paulson, 627 F.2d 83, 86 (CA7 1980); French v. Heyne, 547 F.2d 994, 996 (CA7
1976). Such a complaint should not be dismissed for failure to state a claim unless it appears beyond doubt

that the plaintiff can prove no set of facts in support of his claim which would entitle him to relief. Haines,
supra, at 520-521. And, of course, the allegations of the complaint are generally taken as true for purposes

of a motion to dismiss. Cruz v. Beto, 405 U.S. 319, 322 (1972).
: 1:21-cv-00181-DRC Doc #: 7 Filed: 03/24/21 Page: 5 of 15 PAGEID #: 63

Stephen P. Wallace
455 N. Lake Street
Aurora, Illinois 60506
(630) 995-1195

VACATE-SPW-BK@outlook.com
[U.S. TRUSTEE PROGRAM c/o USTP.Bankruptcy.Fraud@usdoj.gov]

Manish Shah

Criminal Chief-US Attorney’s Office
Northern District of Illinois

219 South Dearborn Street
Chicago, Illinois 60604

FORMAL FILING OF CRIMINAL CHARGES ON BANKRUPTCY TRUSTEE PATRICK J. MALLOY III;
THE PREDICATE INTERLOPER COUNSEL ACTORS IN COLLUSION, AND THEIR MULTIPLE CONSPIRAC

ATTEMPTS TO COMMIT MURDER OF STEPHEN P. WALLACE TO COVER-UP THEIR CRIMINAL
SANITIZING OF US BANKRUPTCY RECORDS, US TAX EVASION & CONVERSION OF DEBTOR
WALLACE’S $30 MILLION+ ESTATE, UNDER COLOR OF LAW VIOLATING [TITLE 18, USC; SECTIONS
241 & 242 COMPELLING SPECIAL GRAND JURY UNDER [TITLE 18, USC; SECTION 3332(a)

Comes now Stephen P. Wallace, VICTIM, who files these Criminal Charges, under penalty of
perjury, individually, and as a [PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERL, ex rel; United States of
America],(enclosed) with the Bankruptcy Fraud Unit of the US Trustee Program & Criminal Section

Chief of the Northern District of Illinois,
1 That Investigate & Confirm the “irrefutable Evidence herein” and the [(4 PDF] Files to follow as a

Supplement to the (‘Operation Truth or Consequences”) (enclosed);

2 That the Named Predicate/Predator Actors continue today to conspire to “evade US Taxes as
they ‘criminally liquidate’ Stephen’s Estate and Defy their “mandated Accounting” of Exhibit “A”
demanded in the A): October 10, 2001 (Docket Entry #35) & October 15, 2001 (Docket Entry #45),
now unavailabie on PACER in USBK for the Western District of Oklahoma in [Case#:01-19481];

B): the December 7, 2001, AFFIDAVIT of David Payne aka DR Payne & Associates; C): the dated
December 8, 2003 CONTRACT with Dana F. Cole & Co.,(enclosed); D): the October 6, 2005 Dana F,
Cole & Co., Demand for Transmission (enclosed in PDF).

3 That the Tulsa County Sheriff Deputy attempted to abduct & murder Wallace on August 2, 2013,
to cover-up Sheriff Glanz Municipal Embezzlement & Attempted Murder of Wallace previously in
2and @ the EDWARD Hospital, Naperville, by an Injection by their Agent while Wallace recovered
from Hip Surgery, thwarted by a [CODE BLUE] Resuscitation of Record c/o Dr. William Sterba;

4 That Actors Trust Company of Oklahoma & Ronald Saffa, “interloper/usurper trustees”,
committed “Fraud on the Court” in their Pleadings in this USDC [Case#:08-cv-5647], by Wallace's
sister, Mary Roma (Wallace) Jage, w[5 year Criminal Statute of Limitation] will expire in October,
2013. Victim & Private Attorney General request the convening of a Special Grand Jury in ‘AN

ABUNDANCE OF CAUTION & FOR GOOD CAUSE SHOWN. Wy

August 29, 2013
Close

uto-reply: USTP Receipt - DO NOT REPLY

From: USTP Bankruptcy Fraud (USTP.Bankruptcy.Fraud@usdoj.gov)
Sent: Thu 8/29/13 11:30 AM
To: SP Wallace (vacate-spw-bk@outlook.com)

The United States Trustee Program ("USTP") has received your report of suspected bankruptcy fraud, and will

review your submission.
All appropriate matters will be forwarded to the proper law enforcement authorities.

Please be advised that it is U.S. Department of Justice policy that criminal investigations may not be
disclosed. Therefore, the USTP will neither confirm nor deny whether a matter may have been referred or
whether it may or may not be under investigation. This means that you will only be contacted if it is
necessary to obtain further information; otherwise, the USTP will not respond to your hotline submission.

10/14/2014 11:17 AM

of 1
of 1

Close

Vy; us trustee program:operation truth or consequence

From: SP Wallace (vacate-spw-bk@outlook.com)

Sent: Fri 8/30/13 1:28 PM

To: Chicago@ic.fbi.gov (chicago@ic.fbi.gov)

Cc: USTP.Bankruptcy.Fraud@usdoj.gov (ustp.bankruptcy.fraud@usdoj.gov)
1 attachment
image.pdf (155.0 KB)

Manish Shah, Criminal Chief of the US Attorney's Office in Chicago referred me to the FBI, et al.

I have multiple [PDF's] as Irrefutable Evidence that I respectfully request an email address to forward
them to as I am almost destitute from Predicate Actors’ criminal conversion & current "stalking of my
Person" for abduction & murder in Aurora. Respectfully submitted, Stephen Wallace

> To: ustp.bankruptcy.fraud@usdoj.gov

> From: simplscan@aurora.lib.il.us

> Subject: us trustee program:operation truth or consequence
> Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2013 19:31:25 +0000

> CC: vacate-spw-bk@outlook.com

>

> Hello,

> The attachment is the image(s) scanned by SimpleScan Station Aurora Public Library
> Thank you.

> http://Awww.aurorapubliclibrary.org

>

> inadvertently omitted signature on Ist of 5 pdf's

10/14/2014 11:15 AM
1-DRC Doc #: 7 Filed: 03/24/21 Page: 8 of 15 PAGEID #: 66
Outtookcom Print Message

Al, BANKRUPTCY TRUSTEE CRIMINAL CHARGES
2NSPIRACY TO COMMIT MURDER

Fron: SP Wallace (vacate-spw-bk@outlook.com)

Sent: Wed 9/11/13 10:58 AM

To: chicago@ic.fbi gov (chicago@ic. fbi gov)

Ce: USTP.Bankruptcy.Fraud@usdoj.gov (ustp.bankruptcy.ftaud@usdoj.gov)

Bee: epgraham@graham-law.com (epgraham@ graham-law.com); dcvisiontech@hotmail.com

(devisiontech@hotmail.com)

6 attachments
mage A.pdf (155.0 KB), image B.pdf (880.9 KB) , image C.pdf (550.7 KB) , image D.pdf
(603.5 KB) , mage E.pdf(733.6 KB) , mage F.pdf(803.7 KB)

Attn; INTAKE UNIT @ FBI:

Per directive yesterday and previous directive of Criminal Chief, Manish Shah, please find enclosures of Formal
Criminal Complaint.

Confirmation of Lead Predicate/Predator Actor, Ronald J. Saffa, committing Fraud on the Court in USDC for
Northern Illinois [Case #:08-cv-5647] for Fraudulent Trustee Representations; Forged Deeds; Financial Fraud
& Identity Theft, but also in Illinois State Court divulged in attorney, Forrest Lammiman's Representation
Declnation Letter [PDF] to follow.

Note: Please preserve the (5 year) Criminal Statute of Limitations due to expire in October, 2013,
from the Date [Case #: 08-cv-5647] was Dismissed.

God Bless America on this September, 11, 2013. Sincerely, Stephen Wallace, Victim & Private
Attorney General
184deDRC Doc #: WURMBal: O3/@4/am Page: 9 of 15 PAGEID #: 67 200)

EXE TX REPORT xEx

TRANSMISSION OK

THARK NO -- 2018
RECIPIENT ADDRESS 12025144001
DESTINATION IO

ST. TINE 10/03 12:24
TIME USE O1' 42

PAGES SENT ]

RESULT OK

Stephen P. Wallace
1116 Sheffer Road Apt. F
Aurora, fllincis 60505
(630) 995-1195

October 3, 2014
Via Fax @ (202) 514-4001

Michael E. Horowitz

USDOJ INSPECTOR GENERAL
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Suite # 4706

Washington, DC 20530

FORMAL REQUEST FOR STATUS UPDATE ON USDOJ SUBMISSIONS OF SEPTEMBER 22,
2014; SEPTEMBER 24, 2014, AND PENDING SEPTEMBER 19, 2014 SUBMISSION TO US AG
CHIEF OF STAFF, CINDY CHANG, REGARDING THE SEPTEMBER 10, 2014 & SEPTEMBER 12,

2014 CRIMINAL CHARGES FILED WITH FORMER ASSOCIATE US AG TONY WEST

Dear USDOF Inspector General Horowitz:

| have Filed the above noted Criminal Charges with the respective USDOJ Agencies as a
VICTIM US Tax Payer. (enclosures)

This 3" day of October, 2014, | Supplement my Charges under the provisions of the RICO
Private Attorney General Statutes, under penalty of perjury, to include:
-Cv-00181-DRC Doc #: 7 Filed: 03/24/21 Page: 10 of 15 PAGEID #: 68
U.S. Department of Justice

Office of the Inspector General

Investigations Division

1425 New York Avenue NW, Suite 7100
Washington, D.C. 20530

October 7, 2014

Stephen P. Wallace
1116 Sheffer Rd, Apt. F
Aurora, IL 60505

Dear Mr. Wallace:
The purpose of this letter is to acknowledge receipt of your correspondence of

September 24, 2014. The matters that you raised are more appropriate for review by
another office or Agency. Therefore, your complaint has been forwarded to:

United States Department of Justice
Office of Professional Responsibility
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Rm 3266
Washington, D.C. 20530
Any further correspondence regarding this matter should be directed to that office.

| hope this answers any questions you have relative to this maiter.

Sincerely,

Office of the Inspector General
Investigations Division

U.S. Department of Justice

Washington, D.C. 20530

Co ere eusessxoo PRIVACY ACT PROTECTED INFORMATION
TOBE OPENED BY ADDRESSEE ONLY

Stephen P. Wallace
1116 Sheffer Rd, Apt. F
Aurora, .

US OFFICIAL MAIL

$300 Penalty .
For Private Use

GE 2 ¢
c #: 7 Filed: 03/24/21 Page: 11 of 15 PAGEID #: 69
U.S. Department of Justice

Office of the Inspector General

Investigations Division

1425 New York Avenue NW, Suite 7100
Washingion, D.C. 20530

November 17, 2014

Stephen P. Wallace
1116 Sheffer Road, #F
Aurora, !L 60505

Dear Mr, Valiace:

The purpose of this letter is to acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated
October 23, 2014. The matters that you raised are more appropriate for review by
another office or Agency. Therefore, your complaint has been forwarded to:

U.S. Department of Justice

Office of Professional Responsibility
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20530

The Office of the Inspector General considers this matter closed. Any further
correspondence regarding this matter should be directed to that office.

| hope this answers any questions you have relative to this matter.

Sincerely,

Office of the Inspector General
Investigations Division
-cv-00181-DRC Doc #: 7 Filed: 03/24/21 Page: 12 of 15 PAGEID #: 70
U.S. Department of Justice

Office of the Inspector General

Investigations Division

1425 New York Avenue NW, Suite 7100
Washington, D.C. 20530

January 5, 2015

Stephen Wallace
1116 Sheffer Road
Apartment F
Aurora, iL 60505

Dear Mr. Wailace:

The purpose of this letter is to acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated
October 3, 2014. The matters that you raised have been reviewed by the staff of the
Investigations Division, Office of the Inspector General.

The primary investigative responsibilities of this office are:

e Allegations of misconduct committed by U.S. Department of Justice employees and
contractors; and

e Waste and abuse by high ranking Department officials, or that affects major
programs and operations.

This Office does not have jurisdiction in the matter you described. Therefore, your
complaint was forwarded to the following office on December 8, 2014:

U.S. Department of Justice
Criminal Division

350 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Room 2107

Washington, DC 20530
Telephone Number 202-353-4641

Any future correspondence regarding this matter should be directed to that office.

Sincerely,

Office of the Inspector General
Investigations Division
Case: 1:21-cv-00181-DRC Doc #: 7 Filed: 03/24/21 Page: 13 of 15 PAGEID #: 71

U.S. Department of Justice
Office of the Inspector General
Investigations Division ,

1428 New York Avenue, N.W., Suiré 7100
Washington, DT 20530 ;

Stephen Wallace
1116 Sheffer Road, Apt. F
Aurora, IL 60505 |

Dear Mr. Wallace: |

i.
The purpose of this letter is to acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated June 2, 2017.
The matters that you raised haye been reviewed by the Investigations Division, Office of the
Inspector General for the U.S. Department of Justice (DOD.
The primary investigative responsibilities of our Office are:

¢ Allegations of misconduct committed by DOJ employees and contractors; and”

e Waste and abuse by-high ranking DOJ officials, or that affects DOJ progranis and
Operations.

Our Office does not have jurisdiction regarding the matter you described. Therefore, as a
courtesy, your complaint has been forwarded to the following office:

Administrative Office of the United States Courts
1 Columbus Circle NE
Washington, DC 20002

Any additional material you provide our Office regarding this matter will not be forwarded to the
above agency. Instead, any future correspondence regarding this matter should be directed to

Please be advised that this is the only correspondence you will receive from our Officeregarding
this matter, unless you submit new information that involves allegations or issues regatding DOJ

employees, contractors, programs or operations.

Thank you for giving us the opportunity to review your concerns.
of |

00181-DRC Doc #: 7 Filed: 03/24/21 Page: 14 of 15 PAGEID #: 72
son 242 Deprivation of rights under ... http://codes. Ip. findlaw.com/uscode/18/1/13/2

| NM Cd Law. FOR LEGAL PROFESSIONALS

18 U.S.C. § 242 : US Code - Section 242: Deprivation of rights
under color of law

Search 18 U.S.C. § 242 : US Code - Section 242: Deprivation of rights under
color of law

e Search by Keyword or Citation

Search |

Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation,
or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory,
Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any
rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the
Constitution or laws of the United States, or to different

punishments, pains, or penalties, on account of such person being
an alien, or by reason of his color, or race, than are prescribed
for the punishment of citizens, shall be fined under this title or
imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury
results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if
such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a
dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this
title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death X
results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if |
such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated
sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or
an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned
for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to

death.
[Notes]
« Prev Up Next »
Conspiracy Civil rights Exclusion.of
jurors on. account

against rights Copyright © 2013 FindLaw, a Thomson Reuters business. All rights reserved. ofracecrcolor
#7 Filed--03/24/21 Page: 15 of 15 PAGEID #: 73

Stephen P. Wallace
1116 Sheffer Road Apt. F
Aurora, lilinois 60505
(630) 995-1195
<spaul.wallace@gmail.com>

Georgetown University, Language & Linguistics-1979; Then moved to Kuwait for merchant
banking relationships; then retained by Al-Sayassah Publishing to join their Netherlands office.

Thunderbird Global Glendale, AZ.-1974; Masters of International Management & Finance.

Southern Methadist University, Dallas, TX.-1973; Masters of Business Administration/Finance.

Loyola University, Chicago, IL.-1971; Bachelor of Arts in Political Science, Spending Junior Year

[‘69/'70] @ the Loyola Rome Center, Italy, studying international Law & Realty Development,

INDEPENDENT U.S. SENATE Candidate (OK); 2008 & 2010; vs, James Inhofe & Tom Coburn.

independent Justice Institute, LLC, Washington DC-1997 to Present: Formed originally as a

non-profit Watchdog group monitoring judicial/legal malfeasance/misfeasance operating
‘under color of law’ by the Washington, DC prominent Firm, [Webster, Chamberlain & Bean];
then as a for-profit Litigation Management Company ( LMO), for Global Collection Services.

River Oaks Development Corporation, Tulsa, OK. -1990 to 2000; Master Planned (300 acre)

upscale golf residential community lying on over a mile of scenic Arkansas River frontage.

Burnham Park Plaza ReHab, Chicago-1985; Procured over $15 million Re-Development Equity
Limited Partnerships Interests for Rehab of former Burnham YMCA into upscale condo/apts.

Wallace Investments, Tulsa, OK. -1984 to 2000; Realty/Oil & Gas Development of extensive
Family Realty Holdings and the Oil & Gas Reserves lying thereunder.

World Trade Services, Inc., Tulsa & Houston.-1976 to 1979; President & Founder of Oklahoma
Export Management Company (EMC), specializing in logistics for chartering ships & expediting
drilling equipment worldwide. Secured Caterpillar international as main Client,

Parker Drilling Company, Tulsa & Houston. - 1974 to 1976; Financial Planning & Control
Analyst for all Global Drilling Operations, as the largest land drilling company in the world.
Extensive travel for interaction with all global subsidies and their administrative officers.

Activities: Retired Tae Kwon Do Karate Black Belt & Budweiser Sponsored Tournament
Soccer Player.


File and source

File

7-motion-to-intervene.pdf

Size

600,349 bytes

SHA-256

0f816d928c5f0964f9c159a4e3bf6c434848e30f5e4076c9af8d93ac77755316

Our copy

7-motion-to-intervene.pdf

Original

storage.courtlistener.com