Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Motion for Summary Judgment — No. 2:20-cv-01537 (Dkt. 60)Search ⌕

Source documents · Archived capture

Motion for Summary Judgment — No. 2:20-cv-01537 (Dkt. 60)

Summary

Plaintiff United States of America's Motion for Summary Judgment in United States of America ex rel. Bryan Quesenberry v. Passive Income Advisors, LLC, and Gena Lofton, Case No. 2:20-cv-01537-RFB-MDC, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada, filed August 7, 2025 as Document 60. The government argues that the undisputed evidence shows the defendants violated the False Claims Act and were unjustly enriched through a PPP loan application to Greater Nevada Credit Union requesting $1,200,000, which represented five employees and average monthly payroll of $1,000,000.00. Its statement of facts says the company received $1,199,999, had no employees on February 15, 2020, and was denied forgiveness by the SBA. The motion asks for judgment of $3,707,996.91, three times the loan plus the processing fee, plus two civil penalties.

Summary drafted by a model from the text of the original file linked on this page and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Archived source document. Preserved source.

View original PDF · 372 KB

Original: archive.org

Record facts

File name60-motion-for-summary-judgment-by-plaintiff-united-states-of-am.pdf
SHA-25649c2b95b654eb5aac50790a37ba3a37b2a74c9d4ccc06ae0c365e7302b67c203
Size381,341 bytes
Source sitearchive.org

File and source

File
60-motion-for-summary-judgment-by-plaintiff-united-states-of-am.pdf
Size
381,341 bytes
SHA-256
49c2b95b654eb5aac50790a37ba3a37b2a74c9d4ccc06ae0c365e7302b67c203
Our copy
60-motion-for-summary-judgment-by-plaintiff-united-states-of-am.pdf
Original
archive.org
Back to top