Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Motion for Leave to File Application of Indigence on interlockatory — No. 1:21-cv-00748 (Dkt. 82)Search ⌕

Motion for Leave to File Application of Indigence on interlockatory — No. 1:21-cv-00748 (Dkt. 82)

Summary

A motion for leave to file an application of indigence, filed by plaintiff Natasha Athens in Favorite Things v. Bank of America et al, No. 1:21-cv-00748-SM (D.N.H.), on January 24, 2022 as Document 82. Athens states that the plaintiff is indigent because the store could not open for 6 months last year and has been closed since Christmas under a second mandate. The motion also asserts that the defendants have defaulted in the district court and on appeal and that a default ruling will be sought in the appeals court. The one-page motion is signed /s/ by Athens.

Summary drafted by a model from the text of the original file linked on this page and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Cite this document

“Motion for Leave to File Application of Indigence on interlockatory — No. 1:21-cv-00748 (Dkt. 82).” Original at archive.org. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/motion-for-leave-to-file-application-of-indigence-on-interlockatory-no-ccbb3967e1/, SHA-256 ac39fa11dcf6bd3ed57879a76639fc417152c8ade635ea437d4877d4064af51c.

Full text

        Case 1:21-cv-00748-SM Document 82 Filed 01/24/22 Page 1 of 1




                   UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                              Concord, NH
                        District of Merrimack NH
                       Docket # . 1:21-cv-00748-SM
                             Favorite Things
                                  a DBA
                            Natasha Athens
                                     v.
                          Bank of America et al
                              Megan Scholz
                               Defendants

PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE APPLICATION OF
INDIGENCE
Now comes the Plaintiff in this matter and states that she is indigent and
has been due to no ability to even open her store last year for 6 months
due to illegal mandates
and this store has been closed since Christmas due to a 2nd new mandate
of forced mask wearing and the Plaintiff cannot wear a mask for medical
reasons.
(None of anyone's business) no one has to reveal their health data
WHEREFORE, this case has already been defaulted on in District court
and on appeal in the earlier illegal rulings, and in this last appeal, the case
has been lost by the Defendant's and needs a default ruling and one will be
filed in appeals court.


/s/ Natasha Athens

January 24/ 2022

File and source

File
82-motion-for-leave-to-file-application-of-indigence-on-interlo.pdf
Size
1,542,959 bytes
SHA-256
ac39fa11dcf6bd3ed57879a76639fc417152c8ade635ea437d4877d4064af51c
Our copy
82-motion-for-leave-to-file-application-of-indigence-on-interlo.pdf
Original
archive.org
Back to top