Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Motion for an Emergency Hearing to Clarify the Defendant's Actions — No. 1:21-cv-00748 (Dkt. 6)Search ⌕

Source documents · Archived capture

Motion for an Emergency Hearing to Clarify the Defendant's Actions — No. 1:21-cv-00748 (Dkt. 6)

Summary

The plaintiff's request for an emergency hearing and second motion to clarify, filed September 13, 2021 as Document 6 in Favorite Things, a DBA of Natasha Athens, v. Bank of America et al, Case 1:21-cv-00748-SM, in the United States District Court at Concord, NH. The filing asks for a Zoom hearing and oral argument and lists questions it wants Bank of America and defendant Megan Scholz to answer under oath about partial PPP loan forgiveness, account closures and use of the SBA direct forgiveness portal. It states that Scholz said a new forgiveness application for $1.00 would be submitted but that none had been sent as of September 9, 2021, and alleges that the plaintiff's business account was closed. A certificate of service states it was sent by email on 9/9/2021.

Summary drafted by a model from the text of the original file linked on this page and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Archived source document. Preserved source.

View original PDF · 494 KB

Original: archive.org

Record facts

File name6-motion-for-an-emergency-hearing-to-clarify-the-defendant-s-a.pdf
SHA-256852831eb9a57a8d76638eabcc30d40e66ba396fce97e5210396c09c62529401c
Size505,998 bytes
Source sitearchive.org

File and source

File
6-motion-for-an-emergency-hearing-to-clarify-the-defendant-s-a.pdf
Size
505,998 bytes
SHA-256
852831eb9a57a8d76638eabcc30d40e66ba396fce97e5210396c09c62529401c
Our copy
6-motion-for-an-emergency-hearing-to-clarify-the-defendant-s-a.pdf
Original
archive.org
Back to top